[manet] DLEP Peer Offer port requirements
"Sipos, Brian J." <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu> Fri, 05 November 2021 12:41 UTC
Return-Path: <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AFD3A0EA0 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 05:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jhuapl.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYaDd5KVaTjY for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 05:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aplegw01.jhuapl.edu (aplegw01.jhuapl.edu [128.244.251.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3E53A0E9F for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 05:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (aplegw01.jhuapl.edu [127.0.0.1]) by aplegw01.jhuapl.edu (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1A5CdTfs139029 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:41:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhuapl.edu; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=JHUAPLDec2018; bh=YKMUVh+cIZV6SCV6SKq3q5ksdhSvlCB9qnfLYL0wI4M=; b=iHknSzyqlct5UydpZcerA1r4DfJrSMTRK2k362yjFScFz/tyALcZlnTpjA1SBqS5q3gw hIIhhZTLLHeGVM/AiTwFdGaETRvIgksG8B1fDgD+eqAellqlu72Ow/OA+AQNIV5aFXUg dtvWGHfp0STworQbk5gkSFzM9i+S8NHkHrzWLHo3qTIFQsLcTOZwbAX2D6ZLdTy+dxcm JctBElABXbqGS4jwLNorjjF86xU4stEC0C+KMJZ8M9VtDNxJhEedJQnS15DKpphAQqar Suq2Qs7L+A/G41LyIvwX9d49QvnetJNurGctAO+3wzTnrJ6aDdOablnmBhzrFLJwvwmf aw==
Received: from aplex02.dom1.jhuapl.edu (aplex02.dom1.jhuapl.edu [128.244.198.6]) by aplegw01.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id 3c4t8488a9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 08:41:08 -0400
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: aplex02.dom1.jhuapl.edu
Received: from APLEX26.dom1.jhuapl.edu (10.114.162.11) by aplex02.dom1.jhuapl.edu (128.244.198.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:41:08 -0400
Received: from APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu (10.114.162.6) by APLEX26.dom1.jhuapl.edu (10.114.162.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.13; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:41:07 -0400
Received: from APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::3c73:f90:20fa:eda1]) by APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::3c73:f90:20fa:eda1%5]) with mapi id 15.02.0922.013; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:41:07 -0400
From: "Sipos, Brian J." <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>
To: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DLEP Peer Offer port requirements
Thread-Index: AdfRg4E27z+WpYrOTdy5+cvPJIaz9w==
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 12:41:07 +0000
Message-ID: <17aaa2573ce44390b71787d0de88b09c@jhuapl.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.162.26]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01A5_01D7D220.DFA3A830"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: aplex02.dom1.jhuapl.edu
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-11-05_01:2021-11-03, 2021-11-04 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/b6We9JetVA2EAAkVASd_7YtIm6E>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 06:17:39 -0700
Subject: [manet] DLEP Peer Offer port requirements
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 12:41:15 -0000
All, I ran into what I think is a gap in the DLEP Peer Offer Signal requirements [1]. Currently, there are requirements about the IP addresses of the Peer Offer Signal but not for the UDP ports. In other protocols where UDP is used in a request-response pattern the source and destination ports of the response datagram are swapped from the ports of the request datagram. Is this pattern also expected to be used by a DLEP modem? If not, how are the ports expected to be coordinated so that the router will receive the Peer Offer Signal? When the correct behavior is figured out, I will write up an errata for this small portion of the document to clarify the Peer Offer UDP ports. Thanks for any clarification, Brian S. [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8175.html#section-12.4
- [manet] DLEP Peer Offer port requirements Sipos, Brian J.
- Re: [manet] DLEP Peer Offer port requirements Taylor, Rick