Re: [manet] What was the Chameleon disaster?

Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Sat, 14 October 2023 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E65C15199B for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 07:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRXSIFOMyrDn for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 07:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ACE2C15198D for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 07:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50567477b29so3831060e87.3 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 07:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697292039; x=1697896839; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ZsgfQIAKJw1xrsR0zVc2IvCgHcDHGKjBoJfL5Jc+mRU=; b=YZUYteHzStPntwAZgYoDqfIZy5OhidB4DeDW2DAAuiuYGV3E7VfZ2lYWSRQ4fgjKJK 6dTwdHl8qDQJVaHHOlr/+5PVtnyPFgDzmc7sRuOukAKydb4O+X4WncmTb/QpODk2FnaG D3xVK6Syf8vGocPJoqM+u4UGBESPvejAtNS+hKAXSC2EthZaUILld1YYnxz7glB5EO9H SvIynEzzo+0yL96v/MFNKtixvizSawBVDEThaJvifcTgPg5Oipjk8dfkhYbLOHUvH3W2 Jak1Ja+r3yGus729SA9frjIGhVMtZmmAGbbQ37VgE/VKC1qr3nFfnkBODqzlVt+I8KWF bfQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697292039; x=1697896839; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZsgfQIAKJw1xrsR0zVc2IvCgHcDHGKjBoJfL5Jc+mRU=; b=RBIFt1t18MmB0NHaRHX1/+DcWF/64FxcPAgxOnpsTSqSAWJBrYbCvvWtP0OlfDGVf4 GfoCP6YeRLINVYOwArLQZhk+UsngRYEtd2+biyfFmsJOOZ6IRPd9BjRPuC9BGTiP3d5r +VjZop+RtG3ZEaKgqXpkQL8nmELlHIO7D54JXodC8Iv4bZeIy67ZzCi12QDRODNf5iFL 6Z9RSjH5PibCQn30CGrFYDptNGhGNF9x1MHfZNX9FDg7kVCzklbbt/NtHFSXs/szKIg6 nNHwCiIZjBQqEodXEbPD6H/lMryY6JM09QkjiFqoxMA64oEqBt+JonICjMT94S3mV76M 0fMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyz2MYPJcyRvXeoo6V2/O+FxwIXX4sGxO5VTrZ4EeRPXVCYUS2P Y0yJj9Xym6boiL1nd/J9IochxgzTtg9q/Ay1RDg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF8jCZBgv69eqsVRV7ZSdmTy/r4acM7JBRpr9nRZ+vojPHFyPQSSy7nq72u5sZ3L7S6TNTrP3OnJZUuyHJaego=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:128a:b0:503:3278:3221 with SMTP id u10-20020a056512128a00b0050332783221mr31030737lfs.69.1697292038920; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 07:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH1P110MB114850D53A9A1E2C447C40EBB0D2A@PH1P110MB1148.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <PH1P110MB114850D53A9A1E2C447C40EBB0D2A@PH1P110MB1148.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 16:00:12 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuppwBb1bVVTUN6pD4tLwNmfZBw1_HP-6H_9eLV1=rgFFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: James.A.Stevens@collins.com
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/cRmpXhaCb44PeMM6DHxsPMw9vmA>
Subject: Re: [manet] What was the Chameleon disaster?
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 14:00:42 -0000

google for "ietf manet chameleon"...

or use this link:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ramrekha-manet-cml-01

Someone put AODV and OLSR (v1) into one protocol, decided that it was
trivial to know when to switch and called it "hybrid/adaptive"... the
WG had a few "pointy" questions the person could not answer... and
because his "hybrid protocol" was already done, the author wasn't
really interesting in building on it or fixing things.

Henning Rogge

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:57 PM Stevens, Jim A Collins
<James.A.Stevens@collins.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:11:22 +0200, Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> | > Hybrid (proactive /reactive) Routing protocol
>
> | MANET WG failed at "reactive routing" because of non-technical issues... I don't think Hybrid protocols would do much better. I still remember the
>
> | Chameleon disaster.
>
>
>
> Henning - What was the Chameleon disaster?
>
>
>
> Jim Stevens
>
>