[manet] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-06: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This work item does not appear to be inside the scope of the MANET charter, at
least based on my reading of the charter. Am I missing something?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support the DISCUSS positions of Warren and Magnus.

I'm unclear on why this specification is necessary, i.e. why the use of
existing transport protocols and processing of DSCPs do not suffice to achieve
what this specification is aiming to achieve. Is that explained in another
document somewhere?

= Section 1 =

"Various flow control methods are possible, e.g.,
   see [I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension]."

The referenced document does not specify a flow control method. Maybe
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control is what was intended?