Re: [manet] MANET agenda?

Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> Sat, 25 March 2017 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEED129416; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 632F2c73JOVH; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com (mail-it0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE1D126C25; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id y18so17688721itc.1; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9d6XyPk7MPXac0Mh7uZXXzMBhWbGUvvIAGvaOaMQmeM=; b=TD7S/nc0R+yOS9hGWbFIKr6xdnEYcqzhubI3ii0NztQcXOxJ704SFfqEXk5YOJxY3c 1LfZkGjGkrPnRU3evSKcevdP+t/Dd1pgOEMlXuon6EGPa6IWyocLEZL8RI9gtw9OTkWP zWmm+PaTkHRmSUYvyJP8007ffgVRvKKkKCeRsDf+aoc2Oy8M1SWgJVO6VEPiJV2MBEIa ipshi5NeTcAvVfSYwtkh+LStD0UPo9Aufs0zCgnjZcbv/6N5lo8LZuyex+B08thKqeFw PCXdSSQCM5PI/d+5CNxsipDWiwDJzwXsFJjrYDkGguCvf7Xkg5svzNJU817HOtdUZFjf GiwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9d6XyPk7MPXac0Mh7uZXXzMBhWbGUvvIAGvaOaMQmeM=; b=jKnY4+xPkfYZKFToAPsApEYzmXYELbqgJqP4IbucsjTLvDMbAm677kbOvJuV0XCXU/ yhM23wIbnc6qYkggiR3YuUBiItkKrXgAaLGRRVWs87AMhI2IPyb0OFoQNfoTMPDIq/Rk rWG8p68dMfke8mlxkI4Efzc+AyUgrTS5nzP0P/Xi1HkitbsitH4Z2LGJGn7furdquca9 zqUcLKmo1RtDl0/fj3CK/aCMsKdJsccOgP52B/L8XJxJh+cJ7F3LEzbaeKDnm70XpL1J 6Ak8p1LfGADa6a2YGJ5JmvYHJQcXz30IgDAb959D6L6Y894BZAMyiemipUWK+csf347v xWPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3DfO+nKgj7bw+iPYNmYL7KCHQmG5HSqekAzdvM+8LQLZFTI5XBALaE9EG5Z8BAnOmAZ167hQ/jyzJvvg==
X-Received: by 10.107.32.199 with SMTP id g190mr15008826iog.117.1490463283610; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.158.4 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA1F025E-4CBD-4D3E-8C88-F55AAAAEBE25@thomasclausen.org>
References: <CA1F025E-4CBD-4D3E-8C88-F55AAAAEBE25@thomasclausen.org>
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:34:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CALtoyokjUZtHt+ZWjJpRPt7F7Q2Q3TMagRJxLt6JF-LtRBFGbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
Cc: manet-ads@ietf.org, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140338a920ef5054b9186bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/dE_ioorNGJ_8UuaMIMsIyjxmAL4>
Subject: Re: [manet] MANET agenda?
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 17:34:46 -0000

Thomas,

No, the meeting has not been canceled. We (the chairs) have just been
remiss in getting the agenda posted. We'll get that done asap.

Regards,
Stan

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Thomas Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I see that the chairs have not posted any agenda  for this IETF:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/manet/meetings/
>
> Given this, and the lack of activity of the list, it seems reasonable to
> infer that the meeting on Thursday is canceled?
>
> --
>
> *Thomas Heide Clausen  <Thomas.Clausen@polytechnique.edu> •  @thclausen
> <http://twitter.com/thclausen>  •  thomasclausen.org
> <http://www.thomasclausen.org/>www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/thomasheideclausen.html
> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/thomasheideclausen.html>*
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>