Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-27.txt

Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Wed, 25 January 2017 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC25F1298D3 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 05:35:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Swr1YYeGi2pm for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 05:35:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E26091298C5 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 05:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id v23so19521800qtb.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 05:35:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tD0rIJgE3G0LtHny4BT3iCWpB1kPkq3fxzN0ggXDczM=; b=ZE14X1bqijp7/Is9rssDBwGr+leaS1/G5ZMqZA7dkwy65hw2PtvRLcBiFvHAKYppcU vR3mf+1BWTdpaYQLHP3+qsLF7k2MbfOzW/PxTIxiibLVMjVkWQUzi2UEA4EiSkT/jY4o IwKcPsfCUxS/FSurqOF6IV1iMBwHoxOtmc7eStlmWWIAmq8YeI6TmnVJEiNtVIWjrOx9 jS6Eu029LTuLISCtBcxsxTT/+qU2lpm8xwJ2/+Va2cdlpC1zDEcxumRdJtJOXtscTISa wun2o89CQ2d7FsKWlJRyN/C2xuaIJqegGvKLz2LlKF2cjNjLiLpD7noaJTToXmRz3VzT Iq0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=tD0rIJgE3G0LtHny4BT3iCWpB1kPkq3fxzN0ggXDczM=; b=hJHN9l/OKFiiJJh7t+Jdw1yu2Pf1sFbmwYm5/yoXRiMaW7NJYFQMu77Dc4cKSlvYI3 tuEfvUp/Toan731kt1KTWdpeMt4SZDLmdfB0nBKrfRkUEsBeCnN41GLI/qmW+5mcsj8S 1BwzVx+8R+GT6THHuyFdnNwdzMMYUQwLD+M/ycN1mKCADud7xfcr50dVZgqqE5aMcpVv HIJFnvtAplsDNw68XLiDa5mzyPlUSs6GbS3F256i2RP9fhasQPJPO72VczcVueBBCklS l8/T4ovjnhDQbkHxr+3mwUbP1rUKfEb4ziYbzTou1TXWK1bnu9YxUEDYSnUpRD6L4ByC 3HXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJQs1woGGC2JgdOsP7lOcwcJhLSGpUtysUAvsl9baLS3C49v7lcBeP9oC9YsOMKNnnqzyCW9GoQ0UOhTQ==
X-Received: by 10.237.37.50 with SMTP id v47mr32295503qtc.126.1485351355872; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 05:35:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.35.228 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 05:35:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <148527472522.12598.17039375382524226738.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148527472522.12598.17039375382524226738.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:35:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuo_LNWBor9ShCpLimkMgK9Qykc1DzfAAptd07Xgm7UDug@mail.gmail.com>
To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/fBxpEcj-I7B0lEMBG99vjWK1ed8>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-27.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:35:59 -0000

Hi,

I am a bit worried about the "secure" flag being pulled into the main
RFC... security comes in different "flavors", which could be an
excellent point in writing a DLEP extension where the radio informs
the router about the security concerns (per radio channel, per client,
...) and maybe even gives the router an information how to send
secured/unsecured frames.

Just a single bit is not really that helpful.

If we need more revisions for DLEP we should work on making them
leaner, not heavier.

Henning Rogge

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:18 PM,  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)
>         Authors         : Stan Ratliff
>                           Shawn Jury
>                           Darryl Satterwhite
>                           Rick Taylor
>                           Bo Berry
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-manet-dlep-27.txt
>         Pages           : 78
>         Date            : 2017-01-24
>
> Abstract:
>    When routing devices rely on modems to effect communications over
>    wireless links, they need timely and accurate knowledge of the
>    characteristics of the link (speed, state, etc.) in order to make
>    routing decisions.  In mobile or other environments where these
>    characteristics change frequently, manual configurations or the
>    inference of state through routing or transport protocols does not
>    allow the router to make the best decisions.  DLEP describes a new
>    protocol for a bidirectional, event-driven communication channel
>    between the router and the modem to facilitate communication of
>    changing link characteristics.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-27
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-27
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet