[manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7182 (5346)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 03 May 2018 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA50112D965 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 05:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vX-_yVqIar6I for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 05:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E13F5126CE8 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2018 05:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7ED66B80D6F; Thu, 3 May 2018 05:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: ulrich@herberg.name, T.Clausen@computer.org, chris.dearlove@baesystems.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, bebemaster@gmail.com, sratliff@idirect.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: denis@ovsienko.info, manet@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180503121232.7ED66B80D6F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 05:12:32 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/ika9aIYmyJY5GLtcIi-4f_-VUbw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 May 2018 12:51:37 -0700
Subject: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7182 (5346)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 12:12:44 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7182,
"Integrity Check Value and Timestamp TLV Definitions for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5346

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info>

Section: 12.1

Original Text
-------------
      then L > log2(NRT/P).  For example, if N is 32, R is 1000, T is
      86400 (I day) and P is 10^-6, then L must be at least 52 bits.


Corrected Text
--------------
      then L > log2(NRT/P).  For example, if N is 32, R is 1000, T is
      86400 (1 day) and P is 10^-6, then L must be at least 52 bits.


Notes
-----
A Roman numeral in this context makes it more difficult to follow.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7182 (draft-ietf-manet-rfc6622-bis-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Integrity Check Value and Timestamp TLV Definitions for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)
Publication Date    : April 2014
Author(s)           : U. Herberg, T. Clausen, C. Dearlove
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG