Re: [manet] planned next steps based on IETF 102

Hi Lou,

I fully support the split (I was one of the proponents).

Also I'm glad to see Stan's name back on the Credit Windowing draft, as
we seem to have gone full-circle, but I think we are back to a sensible
place.

I will give better feedback once I've had a chance to review the split
more extensively.

I'm reserving judgement on the ether-credit extension, as I need to
read the split drafts more carefully.  Yes, I want to use Ether-TOS
markings (explicitly VLAN-IDs) but not necessarily with credit
windowing.  I wonder whether we are requesting too many extension
points from IANA, and whether fewer, e.g. FlowIDs, Credits, might be a
better level of granularity, and result in less drafts just requesting
an extensions point.

I promise a more coherent response when I have some more time next
week.

Cheers,

Rick

On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 13:40 -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
> Please see https://github.com/louberger/dlep-extensions to see a
> preview 
> of the split discussed below (per IETF102).
> 
> Lou
> 
> On 7/30/2018 6:02 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> >       I wanted to confirm a few points discussed at the last
> > meeting
> > (hosted by CCAMP) before making any changes.  Here's what I
> > understood
> > from the meeting:
> > 
> > 1) WRT draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control-02 :
> > 
> > The discussion concluded that the credit window control mechanisms
> > (messages and DIs) should be split from the traffic classification
> > mechanisms.  Assuming there is agreement, the traffic
> > classification
> > will be moved into draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification. 
> > Stan
> > will also be added as an author of
> > draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control as credit window control
> > is
> > derivative of his earlier work.
> > 
> > Does anyone object to this change?
> > 
> > Do the chairs agree with this change?  (once you do, I'll submit
> > the
> > related updates -- this impacts the four drafts.)
> > 
> > 
> > 2) WRT draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension-00
> > 
> > The few people in the room who were interested in the topic, were
> > supportive of adopting this draft.
> > 
> > WG chairs, can we proceed with an adoption poll or is the more WG
> > organization decisions to be made?
> > 
> > That's it,
> > Lou
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > manet mailing list
> > manet@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet