[manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7181 (4872)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 30 November 2016 10:22 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA69312963A for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:22:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TSNo2iMqew-W for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:22:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827F31295CA for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:22:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5DD3EB800F3; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:22:18 -0800 (PST)
To: T.Clausen@computer.org, chris.dearlove@baesystems.com, philippe.jacquet@alcatel-lucent.com, ulrich@herberg.name, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, sratliff@idirect.net, bebemaster@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20161130102218.5DD3EB800F3@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:22:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/jP5TWvlZ2btqLOE_YR-EDaz746c>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:12:29 -0800
Cc: manet@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7181 (4872)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:22:20 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7181, "The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7181&eid=4872 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@gmail.com> Section: 16.2 Original Text ------------- TC messages MAY be generated in response to a change in the information that they are to advertise, indicated by a change in the ANSN in the Neighbor Information Base. In this case, a router MAY send a complete TC message and, if so, MAY restart its TC message schedule. Alternatively, a router MAY send an incomplete TC message with at least the newly advertised network addresses (i.e., not previously, but now, an N_orig_addr or in an N_neighbor_addr_list in a Neighbor Tuple with N_advertised = true or an AL_net_addr) in its Address Blocks, with associated Address Block TLV(s). Note that a router cannot report removal of advertised content using an incomplete TC message. Corrected Text -------------- TC messages MAY be generated in response to a change in the information that they are to advertise, indicated by a change in the ANSN in the Neighbor Information Base. In this case, a router MAY send a complete TC message and, if so, MAY restart its TC message schedule. Alternatively, a router MAY send an incomplete TC message with at least the newly advertised network addresses (i.e., not previously, but now, an N_orig_addr or an N_neighbor_addr_list in a Neighbor Tuple with N_advertised = true or an AL_net_addr) in its Address Blocks, with associated Address Block TLV(s). Note that a router cannot report removal of advertised content using an incomplete TC message. Notes ----- Unnecessary preposition "in" Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7181 (draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-19) -------------------------------------- Title : The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, P. Jacquet, U. Herberg Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7181 (4872) RFC Errata System
- Re: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7181 (… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)