IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] DLEP Metric drafts

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sun, 12 September 2021 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EFE3A1C0A for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 14:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UkQQ1EpW5-28 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 14:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 517143A1C08 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 14:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 192-20020a1c04c9000000b002f7a4ab0a49so4117204wme.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 14:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vAl3NQkJj3fcwflASunZ2SCz2VufytNVzvScZJDaupQ=; b=aCI7Hd2LF/Qwy2FMGFQ/JiIDDQhM+liD0bq9pRtlrMHwuhD6qxCW7tTcE7SUVuKp94 mREPGu7cfVirt9kBEJuLVPbrXnc+dDToqZuhqE9z/PJVqOxMsVYgmt+qSZBUWVdhxKJY oFEhiYTXmEYdev4r2Of9qANzqiMW3SLRRlauUMJLFVDiO/Amf262c9sNWUY5RMNesh91 ouh5NU1oBVaK37ghZXcGoYeFEMEpg/6LH+Bxo4DTimjgseHOJCVG994zwlRD42ZSuR2b MzrTfubR3fRz7b+ETh3gbgJbMKY7kpKKmzySkHL/fXSdKfaLNrEazjGsJdLhbVmLdJvX YqxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vAl3NQkJj3fcwflASunZ2SCz2VufytNVzvScZJDaupQ=; b=viC+jFqgh+QHJsk4wDkJB1FPumb/+nDbT+UQHGagUjJOuO4EgyhddrzzMtU1WAuLiD +kfhsqDQQ9Or1b7OweoDGlaQoesgsQvuQfwPQeN49OneOLxwiyobppT0F/V4Q07bVi5v uMRmykZDlQCupTnZIj2a5aZBBJ27+Oa0lbyZn4x92RcKOfa5O9s/XdZPN9P3Pf8e2TIg vKBsFSxKh74jC/MQSNHs6h0Q8JDe7LlUVhVoRq+58ohYFJ+v8kE8dYH9yLcnSlmMyNja 8zitbUhCObbURzNddx5fYWsjwXeybfj27+nXafRobxDiJ6tWCgADK8+NLkJPUWvszMMC xs+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531onSqNMzXb1JcMLFEivLqUH/GZ1drWxbLVC5GAwk21PFp41BMc hI7qG2kmSb/JG/2JrTw+9q0xVxjsCCMnFnzPuNU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZvjMuaCuK+JXQDspPX8R8+eJ0Ub9U2QhZtho7Ih7RUsdEOIhu86Zc7hLTlmbK1cX0x8TGITa+sE9c83a5BxM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:298:: with SMTP id 24mr158623wmk.116.1631480458443; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 14:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1625728757217.66049@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
In-Reply-To: <1625728757217.66049@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 22:52:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-OgEAT5xSSuJj7Sj+reBQiGeZvpUbN8rj1P+jF-ScWtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rogge, Henning" <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002efd5705cbd2a53f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/lPdd9AOt1zbG0Cgw8eE7-AKOnMw>
Subject: Re: [manet] DLEP Metric drafts
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 21:01:11 -0000

Hi Henning,

In the meeting I showed my interest, but one of the draft I
explained/wanted to know the packet format to be added in draft (as you did
not prefer to use manet-packet), my reason was that frequency band draft
was not important to me only if I have a clear packet format between not
only radio-router but also neighbours as a unified format related to
frequency selected. However, for the other two draft I support totally.

I suggest that the draft includes the use cases or the importance of using
it, adding some text to show advantages, other than proposed by the
original standard 8175, as what is missing in rfc8175. As for the link
quality draft, how we can compare between it and the use of RFC8175 section
13.18 and 13.19.

best regards
AB

On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 9:20 AM Rogge, Henning <
henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> wrote:

> ​Hi,
>
> 3 month gone (and a large time blocker for me and the WG chair also gone)
> since the last meeting.
>
> What is the status and opinion of the WG about the three DLEP drafts I
> presented last IETF meeting? Does the WG want to adopt the drafts (which
> means there will be more)?
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rogge-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-00.txt
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rogge-manet-dlep-radio-band-02.txt
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rogge-manet-dlep-radio-quality-00.txt
>
> Henning Rogge
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email