[manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt
Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 13 October 2025 17:11 UTC
Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: manet@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C22729366C for <manet@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ukg9hamTPPie for <manet@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A08737293658 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-84827ef386aso404774985a.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1760375477; x=1760980277; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=VKKpnMfmWG78iRXEdZ2ZhwZJIXAQIdG7A3IGazcROwQ=; b=GWJvluvpxeBMankojZ5GYNdxejCAB1OmfmQDbSIW32qQDqcQTTccpj6qZ/bZCrKHHG zbhSMhrxCjunQpDZwDjUA3lv/pIaNsaCqyjZnc8qR2lLs4mSzC2BGfmJOOKJSM8+XW+/ 1Qw5rDuxpMaBbXx5K3DZ+uV3uzWl9cqpF+Kxg3r5Czz5NyiC51iHWVyGeGzQNRDPL32I gHsmCsp/B2QKFuHoi8ViSR8yoe1apokqC7sRAONTAsPUoa2w9i+aPJ+6Zj7hMNEquUnF IjoaNtL6IZDPQXghfwxwg6qXLE0Vq6ytnbFtBkojnHtaF97dLNfVhXkYsJRkbmM1Aqqx rysA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1760375477; x=1760980277; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VKKpnMfmWG78iRXEdZ2ZhwZJIXAQIdG7A3IGazcROwQ=; b=YLc5i3mLqm/WtAsPMJ+MUW7BY9G1UHybJhz0IkUuz2zrdg664nsgekoIiS7ACGDfQ7 WpPIPr165qSakjsUw7YyweuA5sHs34g4y0GBpoEbiYzr2iYIXdfkw6ihqIkIG0GrNQTA WjhY4dJHTl/b1SwoKoeONGggxTm1DtMBGNPLOB0ZKmbPojDs/NiD2yTYTR3czp1OBkSl d+b81eAZg5yeXpLWOqz0yE+QQhdVY1TOMrBVexfLQUOoJLvhJGRyJjt6V0FqeTO7XIZX Dvm1e/EQMUxdYmRVVpAeqjowgHdhEENBAqz8UW5Ux8nWmhEKokBOFZX4vkpqGLoRMvjm J/9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YytlsAcnfvK3aKqc49fNd/VyTUryW6bwaJXXJhR5HmxIsmC2MOJ 3W3IfnUoJYJAweNA8+2qhcnOUtWSq7V97nrsOo6v5pnVqdDts3LrJlx1LI/VMChU09Z0KToPbzC y8OsL2S9AnlhcXTIZQa94oGptn4BlEAAfI2Qy
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvzHdKASGTbWUyH39iQoacxepsEQQzfnfCe0+43OAxF78ntFrsJNi+jwIcYSNt uLUvWcegc3ELBvMwpq5cfb/1nHzMe5Co6QWhqHlbi6HxaWcMdsX4q2ZfSxsw20EyBT5iw6FTpcv aEzIQD0GcOPrSvGlCcZVQ1MpezFmOnNzwyaTESdokh215Vl7xx+p2jUWC4I949/BWxxu/1TXb7x bjYeKSn/SywXJUICvD/1KRUxDwMf8o9RnE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGnAmfL5TpfyhMbOO4M9MXxVx0kLmaXK1hirPd+tTsPao2esVw5342lCzkFiSUFfo7jFOeUBlSbdeCrhka/xSQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5e4d:0:b0:4e5:6c5e:430a with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4e6ead671a1mr294953201cf.64.1760375477450; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <174703496493.1518531.618313888065379630@dt-datatracker-58d4498dbd-6gzjf> <CADnDZ8-tyJ4UjfS0c4a-edgj_KUPTpTKLXPCsG+T3J1LGezS6Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8-tyJ4UjfS0c4a-edgj_KUPTpTKLXPCsG+T3J1LGezS6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 13:11:06 -0400
X-Gm-Features: AS18NWBp4ufEm17pMkB1SLQsozBXS5ANktzYpMU3Lnx456U7KBuDdDrxSk88o0E
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHAmyCyewwm3MurzrCuPx-LZ9Xi_qGtTx=J29PBo4wnaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: XLO54MQDXP7LHDIT2D6DHHTMBEWSJ7QE
X-Message-ID-Hash: XLO54MQDXP7LHDIT2D6DHHTMBEWSJ7QE
X-MailFrom: d3e3e3@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-manet.ietf.org-0; header-match-manet.ietf.org-1; header-match-manet.ietf.org-2; header-match-manet.ietf.org-3; header-match-manet.ietf.org-4; header-match-manet.ietf.org-5; header-match-manet.ietf.org-6; header-match-manet.ietf.org-7; header-match-manet.ietf.org-8; header-match-manet.ietf.org-9; header-match-manet.ietf.org-10; header-match-manet.ietf.org-11; header-match-manet.ietf.org-12; header-match-manet.ietf.org-13; header-match-manet.ietf.org-14; header-match-manet.ietf.org-15; header-match-manet.ietf.org-16; header-match-manet.ietf.org-17; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/nOh8ctHor9rUbuU3zfgNgjFBiq8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:manet-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:manet-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:manet-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Abdussalam, My apologies that your comments here and at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/dmgrGMkOS9KXeNMKZ4D1iQUN8Yc/ have not yet been responded to. We will work on improving this draft and the other two active DLEP drafts based on your comments and other comments that have been received. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 5:26 AM Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi draft-author and WG, > > My review AB-2 for the subject titled WG draft. > > Before any review just to say that this draft is not updating RFC8175, but this is an extension draft. > > Firstly, this new draft has some changes due to reviewer-discuss, so I would like to discuss with you those changes > > >Active Time:Time in nanoseconds since the channel has been in use > > I agree with the definition of active time within the table 1, so I think this is the total time of the channel available for communication, so when we change in the draft as define as *used* doesn't that mean busy channel. If yes please amend because I think the table 1 should be consistent within all draft > > This draft supports 8175, so the *dynamic-links* can be point-to-point or shared medium as mentioned in RFC8175. > > > Abstract> > >This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel > > > AB>amend to>Abstract> > This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) to provide the radio channel utilization tlv to the peer router. The radio channel utilization provided measurements at the modem of the data plane radio channel for the router awareness. > > AB>reason> the abstract is short, and it needs to specify the extension is tlv_extension, and we need not to exclude that some MANET may use separate data/control planes/channels per router-modems. > > > AB> > > > draft>section 1> introduction> > mentions the channel utilization (unicast traffic) between two routers, > so is it only point-to-point links this draft is specifying, Please advise? > > >draft>section 1> > > >A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for each DLEP neighbor. > > AB> amend> measurement how a radio channel time is used and how much time resources are available > AB> reason> radio channel doesn't always/only mean time. > > AB>section 2> > A radio that is using independent channel resources for each neighbor (e.g. by beam forming) can also track and report channel usage time for each DLEP neighbor. > > AB> the channel usage will be reported per used-beam, because DLEP neighbor may have two beams per one radio-channel. There is a spatial usage added to the time resources. > > AB> does the draft consider the dynamic channel allocation issues? > AB> why not adding L1-channel/traffic type value? > > > Best Regards > > AB > > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:30 AM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt is now >> available. It is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET) WG of the >> IETF. >> >> Title: DLEP Radio Channel Utilization Extension >> Author: Henning Rogge >> Name: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.txt >> Pages: 8 >> Dates: 2025-05-12 >> >> Abstract: >> >> This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange >> Protocol (DLEP) to provide the utilization of a radio channel. >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization/ >> >> There is also an HTML version available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02.html >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel-utilization-02 >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: >> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> manet mailing list -- manet@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to manet-leave@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > manet mailing list -- manet@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to manet-leave@ietf.org
- [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-channel… internet-drafts
- [manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-cha… Abdussalam Baryun
- [manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-cha… Abdussalam Baryun
- [manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-cha… Abdussalam Baryun
- [manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-cha… Donald Eastlake
- [manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-cha… Henning Rogge
- [manet] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-cha… Henning Rogge