Re: [manet] ARP in MANETS

Ali Hamidian <alexh@telecom.lth.se> Tue, 25 April 2006 16:37 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYQX6-0005b0-KD; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:37:00 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYQX4-0005au-2x for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:36:58 -0400
Received: from anyida.tts.lth.se ([130.235.18.10]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYQX1-0001F2-JQ for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:36:58 -0400
Received: from [192.168.2.19] (lina23.tts.lth.se [130.235.18.83]) by anyida.tts.lth.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA02012; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:36:52 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <444E5064.7060401@telecom.lth.se>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:37:56 +0200
From: Ali Hamidian <alexh@telecom.lth.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040805 Netscape/7.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: yasser lotfy <yasser.lotfy@lycos.com>
Subject: Re: [manet] ARP in MANETS
References: <20060425131258.BBF223384C@ws7-3.us4.outblaze.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060425131258.BBF223384C@ws7-3.us4.outblaze.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc: Rex Buddenberg <budden@nps.navy.mil>, fxbaloch <fxbaloch@wichita.edu>, manet <manet@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-bounces@ietf.org


yasser lotfy wrote:

>Hi All,
>I don't see any point in having ARP in MANET.
>
>MANET relies on 2 fundamental technologies:
>1) The use of IP layer routing to relay packets to destination.
>2) The use of ppp to discover nodes at 1 hop distance
>
>Therefore, you need only to know the MAAC address of your immediate neighbor. Typically, listening to the wireless media is good enough for that.
>  
>
And if you want to send to a station that is quiet? Then I think you 
somehow must request its MAC address.

Kind regards
Ali

>All distant neighbors are reachable via IP routing layer.
>
>Does this make sense?
>
>***********************************************
>A train station is the place where trains stop,
>A bus station is the place where buses stop,
>On my desk they installed a workstation !!
>***********************************************
>  
>

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet