[manet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 30 July 2019 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6277B1201C3; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension@ietf.org, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, manet-chairs@ietf.org, bebemaster@gmail.com, manet@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.99.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <156449930438.2622.7897539215356197038.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:08:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/qNXPuDcuFmQht7PW2emjV5U8-F8>
Subject: [manet] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft?= =?utf-8?q?-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:08:28 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I assume/understand that the measurement/calculation of the min/max values is
implementation specific (as RFC8175 also states for the latency data). However,
I think it would be could to state this explicitly and maybe also give some
hints what to expect, e.g. it could be the 90% quantile rather than the
absolute min/max.