[manet] Fwd: Call for acceptance as Working Group documents

Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> Thu, 19 January 2017 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0098129629 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:19:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9iSeSVUT7X9 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x230.google.com (mail-it0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF53F129476 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:19:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x230.google.com with SMTP id r185so276764ita.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:19:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qmlOQcc3oeo8GAsXHjhx25wr7wT7lg2Mw52nE9jLRV0=; b=U2vlxnwQBzFgVoJDlKXfJhWfzTKVnU+HyHeKX6doQZviWDNEuuAYqI4OFFTNKvW9gE w8VhHyGFNwywLMMdocUzh1daGpnO6FhJaJINipw3glfHZk84DR6yJtWc/xV3sHE0fJYi 0/CFD1qvttNoPy9ZiaQVPjDDvgHGPxiozlHNxxjaJODAjXUSPCj1GwoHav7A/EFP0Kpt AwNJpD0bSYOjNSVzUS6CM6tdNyitZfnbiuOHyBq3e6OCNPetuNJjiM4/rXr7v2c2ctTB kVIao2W7v38fOEWupmJ3lyluV8ofNLv4kLMPb+U/EZVLcLVgVegQlKwI70y7gwfVTSnQ QsYg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=qmlOQcc3oeo8GAsXHjhx25wr7wT7lg2Mw52nE9jLRV0=; b=rCIxwksRz91hGCQMWjC023wKLYc7zmnQEGRUCxYnD0VfuOwdhCBf36a10d3yMC8208 8elm0JESboBaPoPLkTTiJeWI4yT9e/141z7ygSHk7qj96rC7Atzbn+R0ZMaMZKT+G3kj 3NHHHNna23/JYvTP/8oYZLUtWx8NFK1mrsxQ6nGI3fwpwCcZ892AuyPpRlORFhIRZTK8 grBxHMbHeKtPcLyzNOdU0MDUuPSX/dg1+FeitnGDR9VXrFbPp4Iikc2cNwf8uuZzER4X DJpumHBsqU53nGwKsti1VNo2nH6uAmeT/fxfVWIja5AOS9nG6Ft4mQgNO4s//+DUsRim dEbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIczam4ebNMvP1/CRDWWPtE943w0+qR6CPn/sh12OujN9AsXLa95xRc7VZY/1m+ppNOo6KQBdgVF5SU/w==
X-Received: by 10.36.68.130 with SMTP id o124mr29785430ita.62.1484842752244; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:19:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.158.87 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:19:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALtoyokY4GE1LHeGjUXmrHT-TF+=t=QcLuzLpcs7pLBm0RDURQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALtoyokY4GE1LHeGjUXmrHT-TF+=t=QcLuzLpcs7pLBm0RDURQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:19:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CALtoyokhJPhGdv_-wrGdJsHU=vu75DADU6VjZvV6BZZJtU17Rw@mail.gmail.com>
To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11350cd6cb8520054674e419
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/qotfcJ-K6cDCRgPwsJxw1tq_H-c>
Subject: [manet] Fwd: Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:19:14 -0000

WG participants,

Based on earlier complaints, we held off accepting these as WG documents.
The concerns about the "log jam" of documents appears to be resolved, so
I'm restarting this request. Please let the chairs know your thoughts on
acceptance by Feb 2.

Regards,
Stan

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM
Subject: Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>


Hello working group participants,

One of the items identified during the WG meeting in Seoul was to formally
request, via the list, Working Group adoption of 5 extension drafts related
to DLEP. This email is that formal request.

The drafts are:
1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-
latency-extension-00.html
2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-pause-extension-00
3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-00
4. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-00

I have put all 4 extensions on this email for expediency only; please do
not assume that they must be adopted as a group. The chairs would greatly
appreciate thoughts from the WG, both positive and negative.

For purposes of determining WG consensus, a lack of a response will be seen
as indicating support for adopting the draft (e.g. silence == acceptance).

Regards,
Stan