[manet] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 05 August 2019 01:21 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC7112013A; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 18:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension@ietf.org, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, manet-chairs@ietf.org, bebemaster@gmail.com, manet@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.99.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <156496808011.26446.1857465769617803647.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 18:21:20 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/qxJ-AxMEK3cRJucHnM9UimhXrUI>
Subject: [manet] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 01:21:20 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A few questions on unexpected values: ** Section 3. How do the maximum and minimum latency fields relate? For example, what happens if a receiver gets a message where the maximum latency is smaller than the minimum latency. ** Section 3. How do the latency data item and the latency range item relate? For example, what happens if a receiver gets a message that has both a latency data item and a latency range data item, and the reported latency is outside of the latency range?
- [manet] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-iet… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker