Re: [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102
Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Thu, 12 July 2018 16:51 UTC
Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AC9130EA6 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4UxTgwSbqzmn for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 325FA130E89 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b5-v6so13760006qkg.6 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GxODW3YIIGFsPVWdSTy+wfSs0FC/J4uKCHXRqGKKYpQ=; b=GxFCABQ0UC0rapkYtdjBcAoAtx96F3GlU3KJalsmSP/5CtangT60h9YhP7DQlrUib9 HxJeau+FgP9kp5L6p/zPL1ssEZNVvePF/4MlbUj4awlSQWtWoqcRJ2NiSu+BQ9guzaYq 772b4EK6z2f7sJMCZyPYTz21t8r2Pme+bf4J+yBMbeCnbgwbmioovkD0tI4uoXqY5cUu YXEdp2JZPgbVgwMvAcNcsOu2xqWnqfc5ItzW/9VMKFdWrbJ2Rd/p0hdjhXR1RRGqtaI/ 9JGn36EkQFWWuNMyGXlyvjmW1PsyLuavYSh3W5EpXtVzfkYvKETwPTeiZZ0o8+uiYZvp sfsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GxODW3YIIGFsPVWdSTy+wfSs0FC/J4uKCHXRqGKKYpQ=; b=UPwBtjo81F7xzhSJpThOq7mJxa7FWNeGZQcvIyB29z7rLrMyE7SNsKYJA+W1F4VKym /3jUIyBXg8tjCnPAUfm9xRrsZAABkHQoRttl2mGHqvvA2MVV+joVS+ccai2V2q8tZ4ax s090ofRTcbNa2orZtavgcVod05XRa5bM8iq96L51HyZDB5xr+ReNhRH1MKRvXSApMD+c TV9oJ+xegnKvkkEojZWvqXWEi9IkGr1e9eqsZbOW/VHZZECHqJHQNedMuk12alWuIV6F 0PyfFBaVWvg2NZzPOrihFkEZPGyMs/g3Gv+3NWzYd1llA8qoEBhL5q63WkmVoXvFlaxN hiJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHrkKzKKZBm4GBaDz1lQpW3UAf8E229v+4Exw6v4U7IlPZ34iGH /2vYTnjCPPuPNWqlXq2/uXGUdBXm19S70bAN6KgU8Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd7NHj+uWu9gTzwlacvQh51pUNRDHyW4eH99lCB3ecYaypS+vdkCLyFTcfEKFaVPcbLy+mVBAigzcZV5MI8xcU=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:953:: with SMTP id 80-v6mr2478785qkj.331.1531414271288; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0b369e1f-ca7b-54fb-b473-610fef95630f@labn.net> <CAGnRvupKZoi=J8opsPbbsNMa66U9jmS-N6=zf9t5_TFBBM-bbA@mail.gmail.com> <fb55c778646bd5648a64e80a46af966220a47f8a.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <fb55c778646bd5648a64e80a46af966220a47f8a.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 18:50:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuq=YrR-_Kz=ueyBr-r4DGC12iFtjMp9iL66RGHj0+ZGmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Cc: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/rLbPAvRog54mT7OnSAs0fSsUPQ4>
Subject: Re: [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 16:51:15 -0000
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com> wrote: > > Hi Henning, > > I too have been looking at this. I imagine what's needed a new queue > implementation for the tc subsystem that implements token bucket with a > netlink API to user-mode to allow it to be topped up from time to time. Yes, that is exactly what I was thinking too... but it need to be a TC queue that can be nested below something like a priority queue, otherwise flow control for multiple traffic classes (in combination with the LID draft) would be difficult. Henning
- [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102 Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102 Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102 Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102 Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102 Rick Taylor