Re: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6472)

Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com> Wed, 10 March 2021 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C224C3A1266 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:05:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LNSUccxE3GWx for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:05:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tropicalstormsoftware.com (mail.tropicalstormsoftware.com [188.94.42.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 136403A1268 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:05:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com ([fe80::48e4:acbb:6065:8168]) by tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com ([fe80::48e4:acbb:6065:8168%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0513.000; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:05:02 +0000
From: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "sjury@cisco.com" <sjury@cisco.com>, "rick.taylor@airbus.com" <rick.taylor@airbus.com>, "db3546@att.com" <db3546@att.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "martin.vigoureux@nokia.com" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "ronald.intvelt@tno.nl" <ronald.intvelt@tno.nl>
CC: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6472)
Thread-Index: AQHXFcbrZav6i9orYUuPc+QtRv7jtqp9YnOw
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:05:01 +0000
Message-ID: <38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F9801F5A43C5F@tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com>
References: <20210310160318.0D463F40762@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210310160318.0D463F40762@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2a02:1648:4000:120:f579:77ca:e81:3294]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/sCUA1jBMWP731R60B1oASCsZNCk>
Subject: Re: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6472)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:05:13 -0000

Hi All,

I shall be discussing this Errata in the Friday WG meeting.

Cheers,

Rick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: 10 March 2021 16:03
> To: sratliff@idirect.net; sjury@cisco.com; dsatterw@broadcom.com;
> rick.taylor@airbus.com; db3546@att.com; aretana.ietf@gmail.com;
> martin.vigoureux@nokia.com; ronald.intvelt@tno.nl
> Cc: Rick Taylor; manet@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6472)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8175,
> "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6472
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
> 
> Section: 12.4, para 2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> A Peer Offer Signal MUST be encoded within a UDP packet.  The IP source
> and destination fields in the packet MUST be set by swapping the values
> received in the Peer Discovery Signal.  The Peer Offer Signal completes the
> discovery process; see Section 7.1.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> A Peer Offer Signal MUST be encoded within a UDP packet. If the Modem is
> not including IPv4 and IPv6 Connection Point Data Items in the Peer Offer
> Signal, then the IP source field in the packet MUST be set to the unicast
> address the router must use when connecting the DLEP TCP session,
> otherwise any valid local address MUST be used.  The IP destination field in
> the packet MUST be set to the IP source field value received in the Peer
> Discovery Signal.  The Peer Offer Signal completes the discovery process; see
> Section 7.1.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The original text will not result in a valid unicast IP packet.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8175 (draft-ietf-manet-dlep-29)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)
> Publication Date    : June 2017
> Author(s)           : S. Ratliff, S. Jury, D. Satterwhite, R. Taylor, B. Berry
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG