From nobody Wed Mar 16 01:28:22 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06ECC3A11F7 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 01:28:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.107 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imMmL1Jv-vLb for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B353A11C7 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 01:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id n19so2467269lfh.8 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 01:27:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MLlHvOvjVAxnU8ecXBTEXutlUa3Mzd1D7R0Vs5r474Y=; b=IKVAe5t3jXgEMo6r3x6Hqi/6teNzm816JwrHYQq0LuS02BAtXXBwm/mbQBiXJa/WVD z1ywLezATO3uAbfO980oAv/BnzJSk11NC2GVw7P6c67dD5kM/64QYMzxDNGksntPLfOY 3HJ3wc8vQsi3wixvT+3BwyrIZ74wuSlF01I7JaS7r2PTP/1+z3xXPcYPKom1iKadUyPu SFD4CKobqAjnGkoBBG4YwU1sJRImZzL6yTFc53pkbW9rPO+bQ5xxsvLkc7VL70AGhdHv DNz4fjdoMQMfMz1mazyVNtJnRKhFi+roC2UXTeFYe4FkY5qiElx2P9CJg6g735wuv2m+ P1lg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MLlHvOvjVAxnU8ecXBTEXutlUa3Mzd1D7R0Vs5r474Y=; b=no7bXlbCtGCFRVirVs/47Gmeri/l47pHkiEsP6MsARyVRGDVQctv04zRPUEckw6kbp xYaevcTHHla8drkz7cBqlMPjpafg3xcnFpgjDhtNBG2O/ZmtNr1WcPuM/kttc2WeKNCT pNAKxN48xZYNzJDEnpuUfCHk/5tdfYhMUcTFmCdEXqPxUp8E63yQvZNSXeL937UN+BJN hNBuVl3BMa5SOImKCGf2x6whnyWl5V3rYmoHnFXsSL01DjWj891plFllRi2r6Vw27o4M 6FFXDGhBhu56KBJfkKi0x3oyWJkVCuWwyalmH+LpjtcHALsQ6E19B2Z4tc33ug9NPtcH bwMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532swkQP9mVjWK/HuXR6JY5gsUsHKygnv8izFUEIzVGF3G2MssQS 7V04XGbFc32t3dPN8wPWPfmwEYomNGa8dl2Riz1mGJSF X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZ7ckUYNhPDMtgKSIHxZfPvrhK226XqbwXiQmYyAfcvhzgOfST66TL0H+1IyDFOjrVZMI5LYndoucnXdA2s50= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2305:b0:448:614a:b597 with SMTP id o5-20020a056512230500b00448614ab597mr17574527lfu.277.1647419246629; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 01:27:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Henning Rogge Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:25:47 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't" Cc: "manet@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [manet] Call for WG adoption of draft-rogge-manet-dlep-radio-band X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:28:20 -0000 I would really like to hear about ANY opinion on the "frequency hopping" matter... Does an optional additional "frequency range" value resolve this for most people? If the group thinks "yes", I can create and upload an additional revision of my draft. Henning On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:12 AM Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't wrote: > > MANET WG participants, > > > > This is the announcement of a WG adoption call for draft-rogge-manet-dlep= -radio-band, starting today and running for two weeks, i.e. until the end o= f IETF-113. Please express your support for or objections to the adoption o= f this draft as a WG document by means of a post to the MANET WG mailing li= st. (Please do not remain silent). Comments and questions are of course ver= y welcome. > > > > Thanks, > > Don & Ron(ald) > > > > This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you= are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you a= re requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no li= ability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it = and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electro= nic transmission of messages. > > _______________________________________________ > manet mailing list > manet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet