Re: [manet] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 06 August 2019 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769A1120630; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=S+TLb3A9; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ch6FMa7y
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xkEZz6ZSdPDw; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DFDD12035A; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6AA49D; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:59:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Aug 2019 13:59:19 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=4 zwJ/mXtFJHNMi9HwIBwjIwL5bQC1XNAU1R0taTlwZQ=; b=S+TLb3A9nJIz0fZpI YKvyMFNCEMlr4RLZEJMiPjxbLVUzfWlYZJxixkNAtZWxHR9aXkiWN720QfY/Usby 5Z0VsZJUybAYnG+ojsINEyqE8x7J5/qSTO9gjqEpuil2Cvbzfj79/r1yGTcgDAQ4 HkxasehKCAStlEbFfbHo29G36TevsL3SGsJN+8K5NUJJCPzag5bHwzPfrN7eMK71 T0uwLNB1BxWkDwSkbFM8SK/C8B9TDDBtQP9jqU1wDQXWZolEnjv1svbnL7SGTiiv nNeCob+yrqsI11NbLtq99AC1EhzCeHPouaYEvHVcKekkXS5IKqeL/twykvYD9Azw cxgfg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=4zwJ/mXtFJHNMi9HwIBwjIwL5bQC1XNAU1R0taTlw ZQ=; b=ch6FMa7yHZiHbckcE3GT7QH5O09LIPzSZnGWofbwurYI1koe/x4Ogle+M fXX3aZRy6y3Qq/CftcC1iiTbqkGVwJNRzrKfxLkfYO9n0SskJJzs/Ypc0AJFK1ft UQ2RLxOUxGWe0yiitOxrbU1v8u806g99KANfgXHI3xmSeJMkyJIe/U1jWijs2cCA 9/pL+PskiVndry/+Njn1+INVt8WqtNz6xhoAAYcLouLZaVj9X9nfFz5r0S2jg85N afvHzsaLdbYYXF1BtabjJyUhDKHGm/Y/8nc8wHsqmHk7zBMroSidEsal4P9qp3Au T+RdoyNT/Z+m3cjiUpanO4kwaAq+w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:9r9JXf43WScClLrxJ9GvYHu8EpPxy9N4RnfJiB59IAJj1gb0mGMYiw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddruddutddguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhi shhsrgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomh grihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepuddtkedrhedurddutddurdelkeenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:9r9JXQ-8ccgUFzogPiOmKSsrXMu0KFu1SIfOwj-dStLKqPv2Hy9kYQ> <xmx:9r9JXRyCpUDbgKfcrh0iRJsd4Jqxu_VvfvYanB1Z6ZwCmFWuhfd5rg> <xmx:9r9JXfHqmXesACNg3AOR-Np-m_MssCHShthAZM44hOFr6MiZJN8BdQ> <xmx:9r9JXeti0VJHF0nm0y0-iF8wxr5PiAF4PsoLkirKpx1M4cKby0x1lg>
Received: from alcoop-m-c46z.fios-router.home (pool-108-51-101-98.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.101.98]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D3AE038008D; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <156154306499.20237.6931841641823410723@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:59:16 -0400
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, manet@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <02F50F9B-CA8A-4B75-A1C9-9FB106A1E645@cooperw.in>
References: <156154306499.20237.6931841641823410723@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/sZag-L6wkuwWVlZ0XFjPH-4ulz0>
Subject: Re: [manet] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:59:25 -0000

Stewart, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Comments below.

> On Jun 26, 2019, at 5:57 AM, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2019-06-26
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-07-08
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: A very simple well written document ready for publication except for
> one nit and one question.
> 
> Major issues: None.
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
>      A 64-bit unsigned integer, representing the longest transmission
>      delay, in microseconds, that a packet encounters as it is
>      transmitted over the link.
> 
> SB> That is a range 0..58000 years. I wonder if it would have been
> SB> useful to have used ns at a cost of limiting the range to
> SB> only 0..58 years?

I can see the value in this, but presumably consistency with the units for the base spec that defines the latency data item is more important for implementation simplicity.

Alissa

> 
> ==========
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
>                      DLEP Latency Range Extension
>               draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-04
> 
> Abstract
> 
>   This document defines an extension to the DLEP protocol to provide
>   the range of latency that may be experienced on a link.
> 
> SB> I am not sure what the policy WRT to RFC titles is, but DLEP is
> SB> not well known and should be expanded in the abstract.
> ==============
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art