[manet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-rfc5444-usage-06: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Sat, 01 July 2017 12:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: manet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC6912ECAE; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 05:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-rfc5444-usage@ietf.org, aretana@cisco.com, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com>, manet-chairs@ietf.org, bebemaster@gmail.com, manet@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.55.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149891219829.467.11215440795810101248.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 05:29:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/vCV9IB9gIipoM02NR9c93cyAlPg>
Subject: [manet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-rfc5444-usage-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 12:29:58 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-manet-rfc5444-usage-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-rfc5444-usage/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- One question: I’m wondering why the following is not a MUST. Can you maybe provide more information in the draft when modification might be okay? „It is strongly RECOMMENDED that messages are not modified in the latter case, other than updates to their hop count and hop limit fields“
- [manet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-i… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [manet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Spencer Dawkins at IETF