IETF Logo Mail Archive

[manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents

Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> Mon, 28 November 2016 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7024129413 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:26:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2igbDE3hwJBc for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1EE129604 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:26:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a124so235100044ioe.2 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:26:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d9qm0+9+aJrpTOowLM5iJH1EUXvIy5FMqi7vSph3Hx8=; b=vraaLqZecVsFUXINog3fUbFS2WHEfug3vg97DJTY/J4TvOX19vSx9pFfEYajwmDfv1 SNYacQDAG/nI2r015WI1IjhCfQt5mM83NifkCBJ/cIfso3sXPCZ3VqtutHP/jkeXoVBM wqcTM1Dpqn6BJwaJS1bXCmlkEP1l+rqnJJhOpj347lBLLbznzKErIYdwJq6dflXupR7X oL3Hmgli0XpTWcbiDiCT+MoY/bRWg0CRMGFrBeFhWMuAAU+YnnKIIh6jAP7L65kOQgWD kWn0NXbiXHpUG0D+rEJSNPsptFlXn2PPVDZcpW7jB1vfclZ5QXQTk4ga6/up5+CJQH6I PTuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d9qm0+9+aJrpTOowLM5iJH1EUXvIy5FMqi7vSph3Hx8=; b=HlK/Ulpspz66O3JDfbGIGWK62o1jlQAU0OFTkcfWorHMkr308cpDB4ZExAQ/5TpbF4 VWYVK8KpnRrlCfSOWjE3bpHo4QUrWwlSfmdwCVQydoNmHoDb2jw27e7nT1qgHQ+UMTI9 BQdnCbka1jtG1kZ7uAzvU0McPIGpS7EYY/cZqpxsf3T4TuH/XXnzGi/vx1niJdw+rT3i jHMzXw+tX1w+1BU5p1TcL0PLon9WfPl7V4sIiYK7Tl+MxRVNbEVGsnFHuAnU3/MQixfT PUZTjS6hdr93VCx5KnCi/5stRX16KIkpeR4/kbhzZKvn/F2BGXL0Q3JA+Rebk0ehnGX1 VThA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02tMiN2nXFe6sdEz7RjHhyagNQWrPPOGMBgeLYzwRY4HcAG41R02a0/5gOK26lohBMwKT9DpNURekr4FA==
X-Received: by 10.107.164.35 with SMTP id n35mr17777591ioe.171.1480346779365; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:26:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.13.22 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:26:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:26:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CALtoyokY4GE1LHeGjUXmrHT-TF+=t=QcLuzLpcs7pLBm0RDURQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114215b0edb70105425e17b4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/vYLsWVw3CaXEPW_Gj2zyWN-i6og>
Subject: [manet] Call for acceptance as Working Group documents
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:26:28 -0000

Hello working group participants,

One of the items identified during the WG meeting in Seoul was to formally
request, via the list, Working Group adoption of 5 extension drafts related
to DLEP. This email is that formal request.

The drafts are:
1.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-latency-extension-00.html
2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-pause-extension-00
3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-00
4. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-latency-extension-00
5. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-00

I have put all 5 extensions on this email for expediency only; please do
not assume that they must be adopted as a group. The chairs would greatly
appreciate thoughts from the WG, both positive and negative, by December
12.

For purposes of determining WG consensus, a lack of a response will be seen
as indicating support for adopting the draft (e.g. silence == acceptance).

Regards,
Stan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email