[manet] Fwd: [Raw] Proposed RAW charter

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 13 January 2020 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2431200E3 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:23:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmcpEvsA_rS5 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C9C12004C for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:23:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id i16so10146038edr.5 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:23:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jL79IhxAOzShduzVLUVPgRnjNgIiWkcnddvV7s79hFQ=; b=kV04Dvu+u46SodflhuaGpmOVDkGEqS2PmFSi5j1p5kyNx7MDfzGu2GvxTIlw2GH4TZ w8aaRqTdF4OeQurU9qtoAWO99XJv6QIlLOl0Py59n434na5h3P+3iq2m0N+660pxyfTE QI250ImyNDETCvC77hGlzcHSBKECdyqaZADSVwPeD6BUcQwLVKPj7vusYq2RUX9lWA6+ +65GxqHNtMffxluaKjxlKXajOKeSAaivyVSVUx3Yte440LcVLh6jSLp/3oAeuJI+XpMR cc1Qncxw1pmRwzP7OSt0y7uT4Xq2eGZgoBGFcFwRJje2uQGMHr2uJhZAA1u7XeycAHF9 vswQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jL79IhxAOzShduzVLUVPgRnjNgIiWkcnddvV7s79hFQ=; b=VDDOv0Z7vtXMIjO98AbW8g7LhNW42SUXo67hb4+ynsXgTTIX8xWsFOP5B2oGxQJbaC z53tRLem2mwmoh7dxSX1sT+Okz/DZLt95+GD0KEhQI+1cEtuwg4CwrvhKPhwNoqGe0BA 2IrWrFFKxmqILzqipoOxG/Wws8+htsVtJZ2DdHmDqu4qHLOffPJk2WxiJu/dMQRn3A+h JmUjwrUKzSfEbt69451bSEmFhbfVPMlU7vGwBESaJyRbXAbx61Y0wQclKhPAxa8eyBD7 eW7TPJSbkqSrCq5HCtwWh5hYCL+/ZFRngxFV1oyfAcMQDdAtJQtYb3Ol4NQmqZjPvAtN 53LA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUBLFrE9NoWUbXAYON3R4LA/lVGPR6ukcTIbp6Es7cwVtm7oroT HSfATnLnfS5ES+2VAk6XayVEM1P7hhkvXbyenFIlYg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxKySygo3CurXUMwZM+zrRyATKphoIH20ZJvhGGYEg95g1eDZxvWFF9OFmU3Fm3dopK/5BJWGIpw1NcxgaY2dk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1c87:: with SMTP id cy7mr16733090edb.348.1578957827013; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:23:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:23:46 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:23:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESsx2NYm_jaLfQSi2uWox19SKeYaMcPmB0AzPmkg=xJ37Xw@mail.gmail.com>
To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000650185059c0dc447"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/vbBW0Epx90l_6l04cPhZK0HYnbY>
Subject: [manet] Fwd: [Raw] Proposed RAW charter
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 23:23:52 -0000


Bellow is a proposed charter for RAW.  As you can see, it specifically
calls DLEP and the manet WG out.

Please take a look and, as possible, contribute to the definition of the
charter and the work to be done.



On January 13, 2020 at 4:14:59 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (db3546@att.com)


Happy New Year!

As promised, here’s a proposed charter. Please send comments. I’ll be
submitting it to the IESG for the first step (internal review) by the end
of the week.

Note, while the BoF had the most support for doing only use cases and
requirements, I’ve included here also a gap analysis and an
architecture/framework document. I think the gap analysis will be the most
critical. The architecture/framework is intended not to be the typical
comprehensive protocol architecture, but only architectural aspects of what
is needed to enable deployment and usage in a wireless network.

Looking forward to your comments-


(your supporting AD)


Reliable and Available Wireless (RAW) provides for high reliability and
availability for IP connectivity over a wireless medium.. The wireless
medium presents significant challenges to achieve deterministic properties
such as low packet error rate, bounded consecutive losses, and bounded
latency. RAW extends the DetNet Working Group concepts to provide for high
reliability and availability for an IP network utilizing scheduled wireless
segments and other media, e.g., frequency/time-sharing physical media
resources with stochastic traffic: IEEE Std. 802.15.4 timeslotted channel
hopping (TSCH), 3GPP 5G ultra-reliable low latency communications (URLLC),
IEEE 802.11ax/be, and L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System
(LDACS). Similar to DetNet, RAW will stay abstract to the radio layers
underneath, addressing the Layer 3 aspects in support of applications
requiring high reliability and availability.

While DetNet solutions apply to both wireless and wired, there has been
recent industry interest for wireless applications which were not initially
included in the DetNet use cases. One critical application is Aeronautical
Data Communications. The Aeronautical standards work on a physical layer
and data link layer for data communications is reaching maturity and there
is significant interest in developing an IP connectivity solution.

In the interests of providing timely solutions for these newly identified
industry applications, RAW’s focus will be on identifying use cases and
requirements for these new applications. RAW will solicit input on
deployment plans, requirements, and operational practices (including
security and privacy aspects) for these newer industrial applications.
RAW’s primary focus is on identifying areas where the DetNet adaptation to
wireless networks requires additional supporting mechanisms. The RAW
Working Group will also examine the applicability of other existing IETF
work, e.g.., DLEP.  The RAW Working Group will provide input to the DetNet
Working Group, MANET Working Group, and other IETF Working Groups, and
cooperate in reviewing solutions to RAW’s identified deployment problems.
RAW is not chartered to work on a solution, if solution work is needed in
addition to the DetNet solution work or other existing solution work in the
IETF, it will be coordinated on where the work will be done.

The RAW Working Group is planned to be a short timeframe (12-18 months)
Working Group to quickly address these newer industry applications. The
initial milestones will be comprised of Informational documents. The
documents may exist individually or on a git repository. The use case
document may consist of one or more documents to allow users/operators the
opportunity to provide comprehensive deployment plans for these new (to
IETF) technologies. The group will closely coordinate with the DetNet and
MANET Working Groups. The work produced by this group may be of interest to
other SDOs, 3GPP, IEEE, and the Aeronautical industry. No formal
co-ordination is anticipated with these groups at this time.


Draft for “Use Cases” adopted by WG

Draft for “Problem Statement and Requirements” adopted by WG

Draft for “Architectural/Framework aspects to enable deployment and usage
in a wireless network” adopted by WG

Draft for “Evaluation of Existing IETF Tools and Gap Analysis” adopted by WG

Draft for “Use Cases” submit for publication

Draft for “Problem Statement and Requirements” submit for publication

Draft for “Architectural/Framework aspects to enable deployment and usage
in a wireless network” submit for publication

Draft for “Evaluation of Existing IETF Tools and Gap Analysis” submit for

Raw mailing list