[manet] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-07: (with COMMENT)
Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 10 May 2019 14:04 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D529112001E; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension@ietf.org, Stan Ratliff <sratliff@idirect.net>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, manet-chairs@ietf.org, sratliff@idirect.net, manet@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.96.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <155749704986.2814.10311010897802498754.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 07:04:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/xA1xnGZFc5gnrd6bCC0SQa1OfJk>
Subject: [manet] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 14:04:10 -0000
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS cleared, leaving in my previous COMMENT: I support the DISCUSS positions of Warren and Magnus. I'm unclear on why this specification is necessary, i.e. why the use of existing transport protocols and processing of DSCPs do not suffice to achieve what this specification is aiming to achieve. Is that explained in another document somewhere? = Section 1 = "Various flow control methods are possible, e.g., see [I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension]." The referenced document does not specify a flow control method. Maybe draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control is what was intended?
- [manet] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-iet… Alissa Cooper via Datatracker