IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Manycouches] New Normal? [ Stay Home Meet Online (SHMO) draft and proposed WG]

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 14 May 2020 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383733A0B05 for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zLXPlHOY7opp for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870A73A0B03 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2060389D4; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:11:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id g0FEv2WwIp6B; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52819389D3; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26131516; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:13:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, manycouches@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwh_sEkr9LRrU68r-zzqNnFNXWXSjSqZ91BHeNRa2w_USA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E103897C-F9D9-4ED3-AB45-FD2967D7F49E@cooperw.in> <72840D63-E994-454F-83CD-42D2D0924944@cooperw.in> <ea7c94ee-d088-917c-26ff-450ef7d09132@gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwh_sEkr9LRrU68r-zzqNnFNXWXSjSqZ91BHeNRa2w_USA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 10:13:34 -0400
Message-ID: <3233.1589465614@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/0DFUGIoRC-6ili1OanggmWhF84A>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] New Normal? [ Stay Home Meet Online (SHMO) draft and proposed WG]
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List is a design team list to identify issues that would arise should an IETF meeting ever be held with O\(1000\) 'remote' participants." <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 14:13:42 -0000

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
    > I like the idea of more deadlines. But the ID cut off seems like the
    > wrong tool. Its an artifact of the old model. Here an alternative
    > strawman.

A good idea, please take it to manycouches, and I will be happy to help
co-author a draft about this idea.

    > IETF is organized around four quarters. Each quarter there is a series
    > of virtual area meetings followed by a virtual plenary. These should be
    > no more than two days in combination.

    > The formal purpose of the area meetings is for WGs to report progress
    > to their area and the formal purpose of the plenary is to receive
    > progress reports from the areas.

    > The informal purpose of course is to provide deadlines but also to
    > actually facilitate the alleged cross-area fertilization of IETF which
    > is great in theory but rarely happens if we all have a full slate of
    > area WG meetings.

    > WGs could hold virtual interims at any time outside those dates with
    > the proviso that there should be a week before the quarterly. WGs could
    > hold fortnightly con calls if they liked.

    > Area meetings would be scheduled so that people can attend all of them
    > if they choose. Preferably over no more than two days. If the plenary
    > is a half day, that is a total of 7.5 days for the virtual meetings
    > combined.

We should do this REGARDLESS of whether or not we meet again soon.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email