IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Manycouches] Stay Home Meet Online (SHMO) draft and proposed WG

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 03 June 2020 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F72F3A1088 for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 05:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=p+641XfW; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=xhbit5gJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w-8w_aYocX5g for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 05:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563363A1085 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 05:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEAF6D1; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 08:23:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Jun 2020 08:23:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=D 5zt4Q1k0Alxx8PhsCTs4scbSgZn0Vcd69VRafmfxUw=; b=p+641XfWetQWJ6VvQ 86r1bBM2nSED01NhPqaeHCmWg3ixey7ofSq9mqWMApT1NmlHni/eW7tL07LPR//V NTxj+vJv3A91Elh+bDVobMwbq8B/nwiig630jZylmVQl92b2f4w+LlhzO4eD8aLI QdOi+K+PQv8S93stVIGkdO6TQ8mfd2tXhDJO8o7HI1opMUNQtBPvNuh0Wh0p7FKl Ftva/Rc6rBUR9FnRa0ll5AxRhEz0SssT9QdArCxqQzOj90Zy6R1QUdMDXsDk9TcZ 3WPc5xag01yIImjYOBsSPyIdWCXl5uBxt22qwOnM8b2WzT3aEvwA/y86ip9j8Tob bRUVA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=D5zt4Q1k0Alxx8PhsCTs4scbSgZn0Vcd69VRafmfx Uw=; b=xhbit5gJmufzWklg4Y33PLmVANYTlmOWr/yBJrb4gZn+Gd17xlck8o3kR yde+MBmxMweVKFJEAJKcB5YKsjSWNZLOv+xEPYOvbUJIigk1nvQMeaFVRDizgtqG 0MPt+hjc5MK/jlp3yrGwsPWkkouVAizDPE14oQMvNjjv6NJXzLaHAWmVIAW3yGOL V9xW44L1wxRL9Cuy43AdoGgzHXxEer3B6vSrXNsr8uJQ8lyEB5Hp+dKvZ4KRrb5H rChvt703wTwQ6PbkdQ75g4z6Lbx/J8PW+kHe5fbtPjk/i0fSCv2nj7251+OyBcW2 KL56xiVsS0NxiuqJxoTJwHyFLAIvw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Q5bXXpG5Rwe6UQx-PmIZQ4ppq65o-wFWQ8wQvKwjM1D2CrYsh144Yg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudefledgfeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqh hmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhsrgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegt ohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdfftdejtdegieejgfevtefgje fhtdfhkefghfelfedtudfhudevkefhtdfgueeknecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdr tghomhenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdeltdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhn
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Q5bXXuVk5KHRFnuKpaN9grXAYPSFMKiEEIsc-F2QLTCVGEtDoYeQvw> <xmx:Q5bXXrILYbEDDzsa2vPopQ8RdkkAC8LDPEXSptLTrWSXVN1KhKGEWQ> <xmx:Q5bXXvFSzx8aeWUD9U7UZ9pvfgtqeOuTnQEoZ1iFt73qkLer8ChZtg> <xmx:Q5bXXnhlxekiDHbJNtfUP4y6FiYV-1Y6N7RIqKuKaTksEHcV_X0OHg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.90]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 573BB3280065; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 08:23:31 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <2251.1591146507@localhost>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 08:23:30 -0400
Cc: manycouches@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4D474B9A-EBC2-409C-8155-455C9016274A@cooperw.in>
References: <E103897C-F9D9-4ED3-AB45-FD2967D7F49E@cooperw.in> <53DD003D-4464-4F17-92BB-C9B1D7ACF09D@cooperw.in> <82259599-7678-4C5F-A6B4-3E2187645301@cooperw.in> <2251.1591146507@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/OkPAZULz0hQ7_PD2GT06R2Kq0o4>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] Stay Home Meet Online (SHMO) draft and proposed WG
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List is a design team list to identify issues that would arise should an IETF meeting ever be held with O\(1000\) 'remote' participants." <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 12:23:35 -0000

> On Jun 2, 2020, at 9:08 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
>> - What principles need to be considered when determining the meeting
>> fee for fully online meetings. Since remote participation in in-person
>> meetings has historically been at zero cost to participants, LLC and
>> IESG decisions about meeting fees for fully online meetings need to be
>> informed by community consensus guidelines about whether and how to set
>> a registration fee for fully online meetings. This work item is
>> expected to be fulfilled with the publication of one or more
>> informational RFCs. Suggestions for changing the IETF's overall funding
>> model are out of scope.
> 
>> See https://github.com/coopdanger/shmo-charter/pull/1/files
> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks for adding this.
> I don't see an obvious/important way that the text can be improved.
> 
> Is this in front of the IESG this week?

I’d like to give the current text a few days for people to provide comments. Given reactions on the list thus far, it sounds like people are ok with going straight to chartering without a BOF. Unless there are strong objections to that, I’ll plan to initiate chartering next week.

Alissa


> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email