Re: [Manycouches] DOGFOOD Virtual BoF

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 10 April 2019 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4965120072 for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uVsfJgYbLcry for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CCD912037C for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [209.52.88.152]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2A071F459; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:06:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 4BF2A2268; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:06:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
cc: manycouches@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <AB5A9A15-D7EC-421A-B139-19F42A71C747@fugue.com>
References: <AB5A9A15-D7EC-421A-B139-19F42A71C747@fugue.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> message dated "Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:38:49 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:06:32 -0400
Message-ID: <14814.1554901592@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/hsWhA2DMMtLwF0PKxmtlFA7u8LM>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] DOGFOOD Virtual BoF
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List is a design team list to identify issues that would arise should an IETF meeting ever be held with O\(1000\) 'remote' participants." <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:06:35 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
    > Does anybody object to this approach?  If I don’t hear loud objections,
    > I’ll set up a wiki and ask people to work on it; I’d like it if we
    > could do that work before the interim so that at the interim we can
    > talk about it and form some ideas for experimentation.

Does this include a daily summary?  Was that part of the process?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-