Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local time)
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 14:46 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBC23A0EC7; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8HUV9m3csFiv; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 680013A0EC9; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 09KEkMw9050945 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:46:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1603205192; bh=fuC4HNUezFRopbS/0bkvG53MaDu1PRrFcwTZ6ktrnf4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=oOEqSmFYsnh2tOzhLY1podAdvMISWhDHoRvNIIraxO3GqZS0ZdzE0haAk65NvnyYc V0Ip74M4G5YSRuXDb+RbhHEx4o5LDhbfmgJpOcYiQ10Z5BsqbHEuUAevkLpXhxUdtC yX+M7Tpy+zloTw+Ntnn4W5NNeP9DJaXdTBQuAhBs=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, manycouches@ietf.org
References: <160288855079.14008.13967692974159638979@ietfa.amsl.com> <30344.1602894208@localhost> <FD995870-E9C6-4099-93AF-253F0A11F56B@tzi.org> <CADaq8jcKK5kUvU3v7+6gEaeqjqxtw-Bii5is_hoq1ugogCoWPg@mail.gmail.com> <20201017193610.GA39170@kduck.mit.edu> <12526.1602980594@localhost> <98E21051-936F-4599-9736-4159ABF72EFA@gmail.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <d2b27184-3658-24d4-7a75-ee743ba00f20@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:46:22 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <98E21051-936F-4599-9736-4159ABF72EFA@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/mIjsE9ByJdclyFbPpwtDE3cR6Hg>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local time)
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List is a design team list to identify issues that would arise should an IETF meeting ever be held with O\(1000\) 'remote' participants." <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:46:37 -0000
Hi Tim - Advertising, as you suggest, isn't easy. Alissa _did_ send a note to IETF announce with the expected hours several weeks ago (as soon as was reasonable I think, awaiting the decision to be online). See <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/87UYVTTrxUNzTKDzpfhKZq3NYyk>. Where could that have been sent/put that would have been easier for you to see? RjS On 10/20/20 8:20 AM, Tim Chown wrote: >> On 18 Oct 2020, at 01:23, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: >> >> please take followups to manycouches@ only. >> >> On 2020-10-17, at 02:23, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote to wgchairs: >>> It appears that session are scheduled starting at 05:00 UTC, which would be >>> 12:00(noon) Bangkok time. It's really as if this meeting was being >>> held in Madrid. > This is a little surprising. I may not be the only person who didn’t plan to attend IETF 109 on the assumption the meetings would start at 2am or 3am UTC. It would be helpful if for future meetings the planned meeting hours are advertised more clearly well in advance. > > Tim
- [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local time) Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Tim Chown
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Cj Aronson
- Re: [Manycouches] IETF109 starts at noon (local t… Fred Baker
- [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on how… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Martin Duke
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Jay Daley
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Martin Duke
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Martin Duke
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Manycouches] many-fine-dinners --- a view on… Michael Richardson