IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Manycouches] DOGFOOD Virtual BoF

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 10 April 2019 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9DD120072 for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1FFQZv7lNeaC for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA5E12006F for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id z17so2649611qts.13 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=5seC7qqDwcjb8U1cXRer3k3LOBtG+0WfrLjrf1nZZD0=; b=YW5q9cHBQjdmuOQFRO7faedk572EtWB7IjGN5Lg0C1CTj/Rbr7IPKOsxcofG0C03/k NDtMQ0vxzvovifd+1I6PghbE16hAbBrr/asGly9dDtWXnKvrgzZ1UjSqcvbmeA3rbaB9 TwM9tnl91VvaRWCgtDFcGvdguqoFY5y+z2zP2y0ps36S8xS4TK3Dq1Qf5m9JNuRaD9lp T4ksPVmN1Glwk0b11WWx6Ufg2q8L7LCTezHvFdYCq6TBs+ycETcr/jzefVNEhA3oIyTs hTXAn4l1MEWjrTbX2AGVEEwED9fdWipIghRemmCP4l+Izvu+HDySd4rBf1YYZl5BfxLH rq4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=5seC7qqDwcjb8U1cXRer3k3LOBtG+0WfrLjrf1nZZD0=; b=Q40y9tmFQ18kFf9G6aOQ1hNP57i1uuw1duS6O0qSOtwtbbzr65Yhkh71DHLTU4REBh 2XMs2e8fhaQcSpM/lPIvObMS0D8WjaIS8t11wNda6qMmP+LH9zpRWK8ow+4nGTOi1xf0 plMphR9+3QQH0AAvJnJLE44fjov9nhIIFRXDzQFrjcsuExkxSYq3y+wJW64KdcbzzdUr d7+PgXFviHvvzj9Iep3YUHvyRXKrd/U7n+fOn5xEXDs3nbg7g6ViM5QWSBbY3S47ARS7 R/KI3aLKofruE8IFyxw3qp2pjJNU7nX1wfTMlsVymFgSaKlsktM/DYvmM6rMdKgB/5wS YvYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWqskSqBURaPaJdUpJXJSfKCOs0HlEs3Lo59fRIEQvASRu+Javo 8fX9AHxkw+WUCexLh+r7wU9xkhAsPGW4eg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxw7vJpQiPZ6UlxJU9C0r0rClDDwhlRGy8gkjAcEewGEf5Mr7KjOhwHqEgDodj8w7gRtkKVlA==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d483:: with SMTP id u3mr34485084qvh.54.1554901795075; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.100.12] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n201sm19944601qka.10.2019.04.10.06.09.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <F1001B86-3803-4007-B506-047B6DCFF887@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_31DEA295-1704-4696-AC6A-24415CB6F358"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.2\))
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:09:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <14814.1554901592@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Cc: manycouches@ietf.org
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <AB5A9A15-D7EC-421A-B139-19F42A71C747@fugue.com> <14814.1554901592@dooku.sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/o_AQmEymfw5jLQ2tdYw8dTPeuj0>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] DOGFOOD Virtual BoF
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List is a design team list to identify issues that would arise should an IETF meeting ever be held with O\(1000\) 'remote' participants." <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:09:59 -0000

On Apr 10, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> Does this include a daily summary?  Was that part of the process?

It could be.   That raises the question of whether “daily” is the right frequency, though.   Possibly it should be more like work-daily, since if we account for time zones, there are arguably three work days per calendar day and in a virtual interim of the type Wes described, all of those hours would potentially be active.   So having a person who volunteers to do the summary for each of the three time intervals would probably be good.

Alternatively, we could do a running summary in the wiki.   More work, but probably more effective.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email