Re: [Manycouches] [admin-discuss] Follow up on consultation on planning for IETF 111

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F29D3A104C for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTqAD2V3rftP for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3B13A104A for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 13CLoqlw026299 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:50:52 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D31B207A82 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:50:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F684207A6A for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:50:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.14.0.65] ([10.14.0.65]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 13CLoqv8010009 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:50:52 +0200
To: manycouches@ietf.org
References: <LO2P265MB03999D8A17223E35312D8AC2C2719@LO2P265MB0399.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <FBFBB034-33CA-48DF-9C94-9F322C85A879@gmail.com> <6B681B752D32E902CA772AF6@PSB>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <652c911e-7a58-4dcf-abbc-2e83f377c9fb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:50:51 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6B681B752D32E902CA772AF6@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/q4KMMboeiO7mEp_wYvGyZ3CFsSY>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] [admin-discuss] Follow up on consultation on planning for IETF 111
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of remote meeting attendance and virtual IETF meetings, as well as for SHMOO working group" <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:51:00 -0000


Le 12/04/2021 à 04:45, John C Klensin a écrit :
> 
> 
> --On Sunday, April 11, 2021 17:29 -0700 Fred Baker 
> <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Apr 11, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Andrew Campling 
>>> <andrew.campling@419.consulting> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Without these in-person meetings I believe that the IETF risks
>>> fracturing into a number of largely separate activities with
>>> minimal overlap, increasingly driven by the interests of 
>>> companies and with little regard for the "big picture". In-person
>>> meetings build a sense of community as well as fostering the
>>> cross-pollination of ideas, diluting the former risks harming the
>>> community over the medium-term.
>> 
>> I am of a similar opinion/concern.
> 
> To be clear, I agree.  I was not proposing elimination of in-person
> meetings and one of my biggest concerns about the IETF in recent
> years is that several activities seem to be sliding toward isolated
> activities and losing that big picture, since of community, etc.  The
> question I think is worth asking --and the one I, perhaps
> incorrectly, took Brian as asking-- is about how many of those
> meetings we need.

I still need to look for funding of my future meetings participation,
but in that sense it would be easier for me (just my personal case), if
there were only two meetings a year.  If there are three, then I might
skip one and loose track.  Or I might try harder to look for funding and
get funded for 3-times per year travel to IETF.

Alex


    More specifically, is the
> incremental value of three meetings a year over two meetings a year,
> or over five meetings in two years, high enough to justify the
> additional costs (to the IETF and to participants), travel time, etc.
> Conversely, if we need three meetings a year to foster the sense of
> community and other good things you are talking about, would we be
> even better off with four a year or some other larger number?
> 
> best, john
> 
> _______________________________________________ Manycouches mailing
> list Manycouches@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches
>