Re: [Manycouches] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kuehlewind-shmoo-online-meeting-00.txt

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

Martin,

> Meetings run in one of three slots:
> from 0000-0600 UTC ("Asia"), 0800-1400 UTC ("Europe"), or 1600-2200 UTC ("North America").

I think that is very reasonable, although I suggest qualifying it with "approximately". Also, the second one might be more neutrally labelled as "EMEA" (Europe/Middle East/Africa) and the third one as "The Americas".

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 06-Apr-21 07:12, Martin Duke wrote:
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> Thanks for writing this draft. It's going in the right direction.
> 
> In hindsight, I think tying the time zone to the original host venue's time zone has created a lot of unnecessary bikeshedding about whether the time window is "really" Prague time. Furthermore, if we ever have a deliberately planned remote meeting, there may not be a venue to use as a reference.
> 
> I would recommend the following instead:
> Meetings run in one of three slots:
> from 0000-0600 UTC ("Asia"), 0800-1400 UTC ("Europe"), or 1600-2200 UTC ("North America").
> 
> 1. If there are fewer than three in-person meetings in a calendar year, pick the slot from a region that didn't get a meeting
> 2. If all regions got an in-person meeting in the calendar year, pick the one that has not had a remote meeting in its zone for the longest.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:17 AM Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
>     HI all,
> 
>     I submitted a new draft that aims to summarise how we are currently organising online only meetings (inline with the milestones this group has on that).
> 
>     Currently the document is rather recording what we have done than really providing guidance. We don’t have similar guidance for in person-meetings and not sure how much we need to fix in a draft rather then being open to experiment with these things in future. However, documenting where we are seems useful and I am happy to add more concrete guidance for those things where we do manage to reach some consensus.
> 
>     Please have a look and provide feedback!
> 
>     Mirja
> 
>     On 16.03.21, 17:12, "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
> 
>         A new version of I-D, draft-kuehlewind-shmoo-online-meeting-00.txt
>         has been successfully submitted by =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= and posted to the
>         IETF repository.
> 
>         Name:               draft-kuehlewind-shmoo-online-meeting
>         Revision:   00
>         Title:              Guidelines for the Organization of Fully Online Meetings
>         Document date:      2021-03-16
>         Group:              Individual Submission
>         Pages:              6
>         URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kuehlewind-shmoo-online-meeting-00.txt
>         Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuehlewind-shmoo-online-meeting/
>         Html:           https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kuehlewind-shmoo-online-meeting-00.html
>         Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuehlewind-shmoo-online-meeting-00
> 
> 
>         Abstract:
>            This document provides guidelines for the planning and organization
>            of fully online meetings, regarding the number, length, and
>            composition of sessions on the meeting agenda.  These guideline are
>            based on the experience after the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>         until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>.
> 
>         The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Manycouches mailing list
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Manycouches mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches
>