[Maprg] Measurements of MQTT-SN versus CoAP (versus ICN) performance in the IoT
"Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de> Tue, 06 November 2018 10:40 UTC
Return-Path: <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>
X-Original-To: maprg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: maprg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFF91277C8 for <maprg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 02:40:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jpk4hMtDPS1 for <maprg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 02:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx6.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de (mx6.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.6.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC48130DC9 for <maprg@irtf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 02:40:49 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,471,1534802400"; d="scan'208";a="68765012"
Received: from hub02.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de ([141.22.24.51]) by mail6.is.haw-hamburg.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Nov 2018 11:40:47 +0100
Received: from CAS04.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de (2002:8d16:183f::8d16:183f) by HUB02.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de (2002:8d16:1833::8d16:1833) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:40:47 +0100
Received: from [31.133.128.250] (141.22.250.35) by haw-mailer.haw-hamburg.de (141.22.24.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:40:46 +0100
To: maprg@irtf.org
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>
Message-ID: <cbe96404-e9be-1c88-aa84-ff269f50083b@haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:40:41 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [141.22.250.35]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/maprg/NvaNjjXXVYVodDRo6NDwphXzjAc>
Subject: [Maprg] Measurements of MQTT-SN versus CoAP (versus ICN) performance in the IoT
X-BeenThere: maprg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Measurement and Analysis for Protocols \(MAP\) \(Proposed\) RG mailing list" <maprg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/maprg>, <mailto:maprg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/maprg/>
List-Post: <mailto:maprg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:maprg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/maprg>, <mailto:maprg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 10:40:53 -0000
Hi Jaime, all, as just promised, here is the pointer to our measurement study recently presented at the ACM ICN conference 2018 in Boston: https://conferences.sigcomm.org/acm-icn/2018/proceedings/icn18-final46.pdf These measurements looked at a large number of variants of MQTT-SN (on top of UDP) and CoAP and also perform a detailed analysis of packet destiny (loss, retransmissions, etc.) in 802.15.4 constrained IoT networks using various network loads and topologies. Best, Thomas -- Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt ° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences Berliner Tor 7 ° ° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group 20099 Hamburg, Germany ° ° http://inet.haw-hamburg.de/members/schmidt Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
- [Maprg] Measurements of MQTT-SN versus CoAP (vers… Thomas C. Schmidt