[Maprg] [MAPRG and satellite] TCP-specific performance over SATCOM link
Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr> Thu, 28 March 2019 10:45 UTC
Return-Path: <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
X-Original-To: maprg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: maprg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846B012043C for <maprg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 03:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tIuBRoWTmBjt for <maprg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 03:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.cnes.fr (mx1.cnes.fr [194.199.174.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97DD212026F for <maprg@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 03:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,280,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="6735269"
X-IPAS-Result: A2EzAAB5pJxc/wYBeApjHQIFCAWBUggMAYEOgWqBNIwgkGiPDIV3gXsihFkChVI0CQ0BAQMBAQEIAQMCAgKBEYV/XgEVFVYmAQQbgxuBEawKGooZgS8BgVmLboFXh1CDOYImA5EblBAHAoEikj9pilcDiEmLLJUvYYEuMxongzmCFReOHo9IgR8BAQ
X-URL-LookUp-ScanningError: 1
From: Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
To: "'maprg@irtf.org'" <maprg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MAPRG and satellite] TCP-specific performance over SATCOM link
Thread-Index: AdTlUyHV4iWGBMPbSoazEmWBjuH34w==
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:43:51 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:42:40 +0000
Message-ID: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1EBB6555@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.100.1062-24516.006
x-tm-as-result: No--18.507500-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1EBB6555TWMBXP03cnesnet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/maprg/T9wyJ_Fa7kXEgTF48qBRec-mAK0>
Subject: [Maprg] [MAPRG and satellite] TCP-specific performance over SATCOM link
X-BeenThere: maprg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Measurement and Analysis for Protocols \(MAP\) \(Proposed\) RG mailing list" <maprg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/maprg>, <mailto:maprg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/maprg/>
List-Post: <mailto:maprg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:maprg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/maprg>, <mailto:maprg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:45:11 -0000
Hi, Sorry if I did not reach the mic in time - what I wanted to say there : Measuring TCP E2E over SATCOM links is possible but it depends to what extend you have access to what on the other side of the satellite GW : - you can bypass the PEP using UDP tunnels (that is what we do when we evaluate TCP-proxies) - you may have access to the GW and "remove" the proxy Tests over SATCOM infrastructure: - we have infrastructure for hosting SATCOM related tests - do not hesitate to contact me if you want to carry some specific evaluations Cheers, Nico
- [Maprg] [MAPRG and satellite] TCP-specific perfor… Kuhn Nicolas
- Re: [Maprg] [MAPRG and satellite] TCP-specific pe… Joerg Deutschmann