[marf] Slight change to AS document

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 19 April 2012 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28FB21F858D for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aEo3teZPQvQy for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEDC21F855B for <marf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id zzK01i0010ZaKgw01zK0be; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:19:00 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=RaES+iRv c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=8Ubwy9MkvaUA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=mjHVBCgkvyk6C1xD4aEA:9 a=PKryDCmY4RzTEXpJx2YA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=AusslNopkySbTHuR1U4A:9 a=UaGMZB4kMHGruDwexcIA:7 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:19:00 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "marf@ietf.org" <marf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Slight change to AS document
Thread-Index: Ac0egs0krUjVfWwfSsy8/BIcMuIQBg==
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:19:00 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FB672@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.22.1.156]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FB672exchmbx901corpclo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1334877540; bh=tWSOE3PkQEM79cv8p5Pavk+dFB1VdG+NolyYSFB1IGk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=sVRLgJKJK3u3j9fpArpVABEYWPh9b7CkZopFB3UuNjSTQUvqVsx7CujT0wbLRYuDC GyQdbH8kdysupNWpJVoj0zVUfcrQrWxFW6KjSGdD3cXnS34D1px5XKTlkKER/737Ef 9IHjeQB9Ib8t2KbFLHQ6f1j31Uzlj8WyYLM4WsZc=
Subject: [marf] Slight change to AS document
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:19:12 -0000

Fellow MARFers,

IESG Evaluation of the Applicability Statement draft has begun.  One AD has provided some feedback that's led me in the direction of merging Sections 4 and 5, so that there's one top-level section about solicited reports and one about unsolicited reports.  The current arrangement makes it look like we spent a lot less time on unsolicited reports, when in fact we have but there's not as much to say.  I believe the proposed new arrangement improves that somewhat.  There are a couple of other minor text changes as a result of the Gen-ART review, but this is the most substantive change.

So I plan to do that in the very near future (i.e., late tomorrow) unless someone thinks that's a really terrible idea.

-MSK