[marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (5446)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 30 July 2018 07:24 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438DF130E36 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4GOn9Qn_P1lr for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2793127332 for <marf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5E116B80D8A; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf@shaftek.org, standards@taugh.com, msk@cloudmark.com, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, superuser@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martijn@dmarcanalyzer.com, marf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20180730072436.5E116B80D8A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marf/KpceU7Tqmmn-BKJLfl_5A5XXYiE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 14:41:24 -0700
Subject: [marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (5446)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marf/>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:24:51 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5965,
"An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Editorial
Reported by: Martijn van der Lee <martijn@dmarcanalyzer.com>;

Section: B.2

Original Text
Authentication-Results: mail.example.com;
                  spf=fail smtp.mail=somespammer@example.com

Corrected Text
Authentication-Results: mail.example.com;
                  spf=fail smtp.mail=somespammer@example.net

The TLD of the spammer's emailaddress should be `.net` as in the rest of the example.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
Publication Date    : August 2010
Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG