IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [marf] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-01

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Fri, 20 April 2012 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEA221F8670 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XFWJdQLBKEUk for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795B721F866C for <marf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.26]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 0HGx1j0010as01C01HGxcP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:16:57 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fNu7LOme c=1 sm=1 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:17 a=LvckAehuu68A:10 a=qZODYEWQ6tEA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=6-s60PiWim1u0hFyA74A:9 a=KZxLVw75WxjCe1zenf0A:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas902.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::54de:dc60:5f3e:334%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:16:38 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "marf@ietf.org" <marf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-01
Thread-Index: AQHNHxgvZDroB1XnTE+/NFHqiPdv5paj9F7A
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:16:37 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FC807@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120419130040.0b4ee328@elandnews.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FB707@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAC4RtVDGrk9pB1+fuj86gcU4xP_TBh29gSmGGoKw+AeJZ1xBAA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDGrk9pB1+fuj86gcU4xP_TBh29gSmGGoKw+AeJZ1xBAA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1334942217; bh=+/DhjC8FZipLHzsG1c/9jAZhajeSHovA0hZU+5Mc0fU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=KYbdvXpRw1oNuq+JoGwc11opL2B5LwwY7phZ48E7mgRXnEpv/URKMYEi6B0ZPMsxc ikexUEPRgXld0aNEvFYBI1D2eXl5pgievlfJgXGqKXpK9ohlAEIy7GIFO1G/CfNkpY ki37ILyCG2IEmNybSWLXOGC98azAL3eO/YigXNFg=
Subject: Re: [marf] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-01
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:17:12 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
> [mailto:barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 10:08 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: S Moonesamy; apps-discuss@ietf.org; draft-kucherawy-marf-source-
> ports.all@tools.ietf.org; marf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-kucherawy-marf-
> source-ports-01
> 
> > I haven't seen specific section call-outs done in an updating document
> > before, only the "Updates" stuff on the title page.  Is this necessary?
> 
> I've seen it occasionally.  I think that if the sense in which B
> updates A is narrow enough that it's easy to specify what's updated,
> it's quite useful to say what's updated.  I doubt you'll get any
> DISCUSSes if you don't, but anything that will help the reader make
> better use of both specs is a good thing.

Huh, OK.  References added.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email