Re: [marf] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Thu, 26 April 2012 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3260911E80C7 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6x2eFEoyzUVY for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A237711E80BA for <marf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CDE20E40E9; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:31:46 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1335407506; bh=ZoU5z5msFVjaZhBt+uRSfsdImBWs/ITPALPEgloqzn0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=hG/x9CoY2r8/xdHZzXKxv9a0G6VCqN1C34ysN8e+7Dy4dLj9FYwYzZSYboD0wGxBp 0CFMwnTpW1bmbmwOqV0ssvjqNVaSS/yhl+vbd8jDowV3oerZlMj3XLbYpUPj1grOep 6GbHlay6VWcf0hZloF6/NvnXnX5kpxVwobeCOw1M=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE21220E4099; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:31:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: marf@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:31:46 -0400
Message-ID: <2738950.6u00tuJOUs@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.2 (Linux/3.2.0-23-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.2; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928103065@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120423094450.10355.95358.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F989190.20200@qualcomm.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928103065@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [marf] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:31:53 -0000

On Thursday, April 26, 2012 02:07:34 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pete Resnick [mailto:presnick@qualcomm.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:07 PM
> > To: Benoit Claise
> > Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy; draft-ietf-marf-as@tools.ietf.org; marf-
> > chairs@tools.ietf.org; The IESG; marf@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with
> > DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> > 
> > After chatting with Benoit offline, I now believe that your addition
> > actually increased confusion rather than decreased. What I think you
> > want to say is something like, "Further introduction to this topic may
> > be found in 6449, which has more information about the general topic of
> > abuse reporting. Many of the specific ARF guidelines in this document
> > were taken from the principles presented in 6449." The text you've got
> > now 'buries the lead'.
> > 
> > Not required, but I think this might help.
> 
> I'm fine with that if you want to do it as an RFC Editor note.  If you need
> a -17, let me know.

If you do a -17, please fix the believe thing too.

Scott K