Re: [marf] [taugh.com-standards] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (4421)

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 19 July 2015 18:25 UTC

Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:25:37 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1507191424250.66880@ary.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150719095616.0CD94180205@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20150719095616.0CD94180205@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marf/WOD0YfgyQA8Dxr4eDcyIvpKNnMg>
Cc: ietf@shaftek.org, simon.leinen@switch.ch, msk@cloudmark.com, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, marf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [marf] [taugh.com-standards] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (4421)
Precedence: list

Barry points out that the same text appears on page 24 in section B.2, and 
thereis an extra blank line there.  Oops.  That really is a mistake.

R's,
John


> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5965,
> "An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5965&eid=4421
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
>
> Section: B.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
>   Content-Type: message/rfc822
>   Content-Disposition: inline
>
>   From: <somespammer@example.net>
>   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
>        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
>        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400
>
>   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
>   Subject: Earn money
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
>   Content-Type: message/rfc822
>   Content-Disposition: inline
>
>   From: <somespammer@example.net>
>   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
>        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
>        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400
>   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
>   Subject: Earn money
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> In the second example report, there is an empty line in the middle of the headers section of the quoted rfc822 message.  This seems wrong.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
> Publication Date    : August 2010
> Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

[marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (4421) RFC Errata System
[marf] [Errata Verified] RFC5965 (4421) RFC Errata System
Re: [marf] [taugh.com-standards] [Editorial Errat… John R Levine