[marf] [Errata Verified] RFC5965 (4421)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 19 July 2015 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0AB1A92DE; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oeut_sGhhV2w; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696DA1A92E6; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 84A3A180205; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: simon.leinen@switch.ch, ietf@shaftek.org, standards@taugh.com, msk@cloudmark.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150719102319.84A3A180205@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:23:19 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marf/_42QqoSPK_JGGHJqQjdUeJDwc_Y>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, marf@ietf.org
Subject: [marf] [Errata Verified] RFC5965 (4421)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marf/>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 10:27:06 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC5965,
"An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5965&eid=4421

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
Date Reported: 2015-07-19
Verified by: Barry Leiba (IESG)

Section: B.2

Original Text
-------------
   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
   Content-Type: message/rfc822
   Content-Disposition: inline

   From: <somespammer@example.net>
   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400

   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
   Subject: Earn money


Corrected Text
--------------
   --part1_13d.2e68ed54_boundary
   Content-Type: message/rfc822
   Content-Disposition: inline

   From: <somespammer@example.net>
   Received: from mailserver.example.net (mailserver.example.net
        [192.0.2.1]) by example.com with ESMTP id M63d4137594e46;
        Thu, 08 Mar 2005 14:00:00 -0400
   To: <Undisclosed Recipients>
   Subject: Earn money


Notes
-----
In the second example report, there is an empty line in the middle of the headers section of the quoted rfc822 message.  This seems wrong.

--------------------------------------
RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
Publication Date    : August 2010
Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG