[marf] IANA Modifier Names registry
SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 26 June 2012 18:26 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647CA21F85AD for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZ3BYus7UODK for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750AF21F85AA for <marf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5QIPtSu014295; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1340735160; i=@resistor.net; bh=NKoRmgz83H9mAb+dBBV6BP5Ot3jIaFerIePcDbLh0CE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=phc/ygLRSo4G0RaV5FOn3BxeWgkFS6PcR37T7sOffB88dzrmeoK6vs5+mDMvFD1yu 2ckvTLhA9auZbPFyxxLhFT9K64bUOQ388BG/f1oW17AUKB9c4oi10bxF4sSJx/z9Ss txIUYQM0JC6zvItUwUI7eZ9tCOJXo7/qIbTld0VQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1340735160; i=@resistor.net; bh=NKoRmgz83H9mAb+dBBV6BP5Ot3jIaFerIePcDbLh0CE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=INXBIh9ZreR2l6a1G5C8uyNG6Ih5eHkgYjWMrh40CFM722NGa06V47OckJXuos5xS sl22m72WCs6FoDe699zTjK7ZOEIhs0u2zOhsiVCW3zYWsJihklxJAOIRTmITP2VB7I Qy+Ldrko2yQBWHbM9u5pRplsMs+KBmL4czQJvy5I=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120626111934.0a7de9f0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:25:23 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: marf@ietf.org
Subject: [marf] IANA Modifier Names registry
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:26:05 -0000
Hi Murray, I noticed that the IANA Modifier Names (SPF) registry references draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-10. Shouldn't that be updated to RFC 6652? Regards, -sm
- [marf] IANA Modifier Names registry SM
- Re: [marf] IANA Modifier Names registry Murray S. Kucherawy