Re: [marf] Reviewers for draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Thu, 19 April 2012 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2EF11E8088 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JFDlboporV1D for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDE511E8087 for <marf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C52420E40CC; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:44:17 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1334864657; bh=YwR/fuL9mKa8hG4hcjuiFKhdLxRGaJRgpd4EjMEvKPg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=DTUKRGLepGGRczgEcbmP8nXI9Xl/JzCBk6AxYaRDXSbsCsKXCSCDZrQo92xtq2T2S qlASz8soNeyPZI8AarpxbBSs8ikr2Zndn8MC6XDx6MJNnLJBRE9czHN2BrvltsX6j2 pL1fXt3ztVauaO0bBpGkJAKtgYJVo3wz66QTvo9c=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (46.sub-97-164-126.myvzw.com [97.164.126.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DB4120E408F; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:44:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: marf@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:43:51 -0400
Message-ID: <1478776.STKdLvcush@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.2 (Linux/3.2.0-23-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.2; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <938CD663-D2D5-4E65-B3D4-B02424DC7124@wordtothewise.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FAF8D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <938CD663-D2D5-4E65-B3D4-B02424DC7124@wordtothewise.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [marf] Reviewers for draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:44:18 -0000

On Thursday, April 19, 2012 11:49:41 AM Steve Atkins wrote:
> [LOG] recommends UTC timestamps for everything. Do we want to encourage that
> for ARF too?

For interoperability purposes, it's sufficient if the TZ is recorded, I think 
that's sufficient.

Scott K