Re: [marf] Robert Sparks' Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 25 April 2012 05:30 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD9921F8666 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.065
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.065 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8KAvXbaOX+G for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BC321F8665 for <marf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 13373 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2012 05:30:01 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 25 Apr 2012 05:30:01 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=4f978bd9.xn--30v786c.k1204; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=12JVuZeB3XEHfLRhul+/hyA5AuNPzuJSAwy7dRSUOPk=; b=Ur+c+KU79v/z2e810DLMyvI3sfYTy3a0oQ5j4Y08UjJUYVBcooecBlls6/2m0LwVcNGFmv7BVufcQe9B9SDAXrJt8F7n4p+FnJ7J2OUu2wdl8+sgWCflo51S1Qc9g3us1X+Oshi9z6oaWNFTYx0ivjbzZFZKFh6rjaWL0/OYjwg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=4f978bd9.xn--30v786c.k1204; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=12JVuZeB3XEHfLRhul+/hyA5AuNPzuJSAwy7dRSUOPk=; b=Bk47HUgxT7O3ru1D6LfvPPHIgD5/Xk0Io88dLBdahBlDBqVvmMZFwSoCluG8tRyY9J2QLIFsqT5WGKkRWbu7kcpyoKM0MFIIWFRsidZESmpnfmSSzzUR1lUQc/tCkkfNmEu/rSWlYCQsXHQBciibC7HW6ijUdx6g7JaXTOkoKCs=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:29:39 -0000
Message-ID: <20120425052939.92779.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: marf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928101C27@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [marf] Robert Sparks' Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:30:03 -0000

>> In section 5.1 item 1, is there a typical unstandardized out-of-band
>> mechanism for telling unsolicited reporters to please stop that you can
>> call out as an example (an existence proof)?
>
>I'll see if I can find one.  I don't know of one personally, but someone in the
>working group probably does.

Given that the unsolicited report has a working return address, the
recipient of the report writes back and says, in English, we're not
responsible for this mail, stop sending them to us.

R's,
John