IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [marf] [taugh.com-standards] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (7091)

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 16 August 2022 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DF5C1522AD for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=SA9ayvPw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=TSNOCYt4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFbQ5elHm7XB for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AABBC14CE3F for <marf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 77085 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2022 14:46:55 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=12d1b.62fbaddf.k2208; bh=9S7qewXr8ChTfnFJtPDiQAX9M+noeMK56e2SRGvKRXg=; b=SA9ayvPwW/bouJcQnPmR7xyhhEfffjE2Tpaub5KTZSKCghq4IyMjukX77wnXr+rOPrY7TTUu9qWLHEcVH6m538LJ7g1OK3FytZelLpnwpM5vYIVRsT3jStnoJHqKozY8ONbOUqJJEoTZJ/Wv4q7xmIGlqqP1CtxSkIsSjdVqKZXMni1XvAKh7+sq50yNunJeXQBHCBIDT5HjDidzyU8oeg3RulnIS4lqLngjwoOBA7jyRWUlmrHeWqMqbWxITtn496PG8/3YT58sQEdWXvqyA7imFHFV+TgG4518WdLRW5OcJrGunjbD9SZe7nKJ0Xe7+F7x5rGlnbwO7+hbAuOZZA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=12d1b.62fbaddf.k2208; bh=9S7qewXr8ChTfnFJtPDiQAX9M+noeMK56e2SRGvKRXg=; b=TSNOCYt43AY6WMdoxznkLZ5mXXByvzyWnCsjxSpcWE71hpsbxgsKiP6fWGW8bSlRL1cHt2agUrnamGuWhMCEvU0hmEjHB2QlmbhAy2Gu7D14ovd96VP+NXhIqH8g9a/xGisXcbfaVI33sapcy7s0+oeiNjB+S3lWrqU6U7Hg4gtDh85oI5Bi1lOrgYqK9A51GpkRZwjEua1pwnMEOHvGzeF2PJlf7D0Kqj2KvxOd0baI+PPgg9WIQTZxAbrEmxHmFCKIkm88MQCOoRA+4Zu75NKgjD7KlLc1Hbn0IHcP71GTAJIgZl7jQxwPa7Ihqi2PVmSk/3/aTXntLg95eR0C4Q==
Received: from ary.hsd1.nj.comcast.net ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 16 Aug 2022 14:46:54 -0000
Received: by ary.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 73F1247A7890; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:46:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7006B47A788F; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:46:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:46:54 -0400
Message-ID: <0626b0f3-d773-3c44-07b1-784a6089d5aa@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: vesely@tana.it, ietf@shaftek.org, standards@taugh.com, msk@cloudmark.com, marf@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.hsd1.nj.comcast.net
In-Reply-To: <20220816091143.340A44C29A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <20220816091143.340A44C29A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marf/sd9GUyeS3YnP2YjJG3956p5aL6E>
Subject: Re: [marf] [taugh.com-standards] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (7091)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marf/>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:47:02 -0000

Please reject this.  Each report is about a single message even if the 
incidents field says it's related to others.

R's,
John


On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, RFC Errata System wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5965,
> "An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7091
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
>
> Section: 2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>   e.  Except as discussed below, each feedback report MUST be related
>       to only a single email message.  Summary and aggregate formats
>       are outside of the scope of this specification.
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   e.  Except when using the Incidents field (see below),
>       each feedback report MUST be related
>       to only a single email message.  Summary and aggregate formats
>       are outside of the scope of this specification.
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> There doesn't seem to be another discussion of similarity.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
> Publication Date    : August 2010
> Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email