IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [marf] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 26 April 2012 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C6321E80C9 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrFW805j6Ctb for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C3921E8043 for <marf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.26]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 2S7b1j0010as01C01S7bcJ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:07:47 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=VPNfbqzX c=1 sm=1 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:17 a=ldJM1g7oyCcA:10 a=vGmJt43tM7QA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=EUspDBNiAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=ZPIc7RCp-tn5NJzs1bYA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=IG2fH9E8heMA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas902.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::54de:dc60:5f3e:334%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:07:35 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHNITXMIbyZo9yVYUqgbSkbCNchdJaqoG6QgAEn8gCAAOt1AP//rDng
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:07:34 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928103065@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120423094450.10355.95358.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810193D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F97CC0C.6010209@cisco.com> <4F989190.20200@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F989190.20200@qualcomm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [67.160.203.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1335406067; bh=vKZWSbKv0u2uRYptzChJUgljkE6w8/Lcra/LphbC4Og=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=q5q9ZubgZJT4MInfx7d+kh9rSx/yucWnBwEuiNkxPkS2VqUH97+dspoXxsrqhwHkb v5w7Jvu6xKI3SOlllkFLpkY6hl+QTwlidxfrL2MidgL3/J/jV6jBuRRt9rdjvcErlU aMTZ72wyMBvT7rZ8iNVVjN2M+fCHQTxPYnFkM4Pk=
Cc: "draft-ietf-marf-as@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-marf-as@tools.ietf.org>, "marf-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <marf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "marf@ietf.org" <marf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [marf] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:07:59 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Resnick [mailto:presnick@qualcomm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:07 PM
> To: Benoit Claise
> Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy; draft-ietf-marf-as@tools.ietf.org; marf-
> chairs@tools.ietf.org; The IESG; marf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with
> DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> After chatting with Benoit offline, I now believe that your addition
> actually increased confusion rather than decreased. What I think you
> want to say is something like, "Further introduction to this topic may
> be found in 6449, which has more information about the general topic of
> abuse reporting. Many of the specific ARF guidelines in this document
> were taken from the principles presented in 6449." The text you've got
> now 'buries the lead'.
> 
> Not required, but I think this might help.

I'm fine with that if you want to do it as an RFC Editor note.  If you need a -17, let me know.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email