IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Marnew] Programme Committee and position papers

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 18 June 2015 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3691B30F3 for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 02:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cCA6K5zEP6m9 for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 02:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BD471B30F4 for <marnew@iab.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 02:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgzl5 with SMTP id l5so58957715wgz.3 for <marnew@iab.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 02:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hDG6gZ0+OdULM6YJBSx8bcdkWlTQP6y/+mx+xfDoZDI=; b=dVkRkGIwXP3wfZwtP9FO1O/5CDsj3ur2CVtWrzGXHk8Ba844L1l2KrzHvmUfJgbxMV IpVJKu0yXYgJEVdP/VyHy0uSzVMdox09JqHJ0CkLwcFKVveTza9r9HK9t7lS0JkNhusk aIlaWSo3fGPVarQHcf2mvX0MWtyTom1fAKL80/85vKd91+YdkKShDG6BtX3JZ5yZSmRR Qh+UKCgDLghNWhy3caP6ByW9krGpP7ofZkRIN3ZjkboOvAeZLvjjofAYZW5bt74oiajk EtX9NJCwprI+oaSww63ap804O32r9EgRC0MAYI8c5yRAsVsoquHA412J3cERmU9/OBa5 pYgA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.222.230 with SMTP id qp6mr14365375wjc.70.1434621009875; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 02:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.148.148 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 02:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <73D573DD-EB28-4A10-9A00-A90ECE526671@piuha.net>
References: <34A876F7-413F-43E7-8330-7A65A4DBE15C@gsma.com> <CA+9kkMD=wJU2PrWM0RsqnZdKELin=+W=Mf-mASZrWdbjh_CePg@mail.gmail.com> <6AF10D6B-17FC-4743-9F5C-29F3B83C4B69@telefonica.com> <E8486C61-276B-4CB9-8980-AB68F0BE2D84@gsma.com> <18C8C67C-CFA2-4A0A-A161-5BACC8C7E6DA@piuha.net> <123B6A81-8246-43EB-9E42-B05613E820D4@gmail.com> <73D573DD-EB28-4A10-9A00-A90ECE526671@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 05:50:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6Xp-jigtipQzpDMjDvW3qnzxas=A-yze6VU7r_L8Z_Ug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3bad8ae58260518c7bb29
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marnew/2wUiXtMyw5zkCiLznOZk4UbUI1I>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Natasha Rooney <nrooney@gsma.com>, "marnew@iab.org" <marnew@iab.org>, DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>
Subject: Re: [Marnew] Programme Committee and position papers
X-BeenThere: marnew@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Managing Radio Networks in an Encrypted World <marnew.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/marnew/>
List-Post: <mailto:marnew@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:50:13 -0000

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

>
> > My ubiquitous encryption draft could serve as my paper if a separate one
> is not needed.
>
> Definitely. That would be an excellent submission. (Or if you have time,
> some high-level conclusions that you could draw from that would also be
> interesting.)
>

Yes, raising it at FIRST today certainly caused a stir :-)  We may have
some increased participation in a few IETF lists by those affected.


>
> Jari
>
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email