IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Marnew] RFC 6077

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 24 September 2015 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F511AD1F5 for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4BNPWqmDQ6km for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56B581A6F45 for <marnew@iab.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykdt18 with SMTP id t18so88823843ykd.3 for <marnew@iab.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zzEkZWM/MFbmuN+wnWL2UZQ0nm85dZhQ8R62DGDxm3g=; b=0B9YS3wLIUa79RP1zQGVsge42HH6BxPYcRNlSFAjyGdnOKTkKOkhK5AGTTUpYmkbx7 CJvgIvpTyo4Sm0XPjIh9uNVjjfPtttGObqrfon+Cp2CbogU2oYb90O8kn/m7tXygzSa8 WKYhhE017Dlr7AQWicsqc/YMu4ccxABaQz/K5xtTI5HAibmnS9zJRwpFFy2do+3pOS7s sO7IBg3c5ir5GtEfNJZhWhXUY88NAyDI4po4Ol+SkuPQX6n9g7x2TbGiQNRxPwPi+4rO H+5iVuoTP5eCqMSS8lSVkMVcWIaoLSifbNA3eC+T6oBjO7QS1nVaae2PvCCqKuyiuNzm PG3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.8.68 with SMTP id 65mr278177vki.154.1443112449553; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.54.8 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D2296DAD.1DF424%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D484CEA55@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <1btgnrka8yjoatcenyhh7rj9.1443094482483@email.android.com> <A98526CB-31EA-4CA0-A7CE-F0DA9645AE33@fb.com> <CAD6AjGQdyTRR=19SOTkjq1dm0d+1LRTTLKQNH9S-6wUNgnGZeA@mail.gmail.com> <816A185E-0255-46FF-BCBF-6334C43C18B2@fb.com> <5603FB23.2080909@vasonanetworks.com> <D2296DAD.1DF424%sgundave@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:34:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eGRh4=Z=Zo6brfLNnsHc9jn_wdVyGncVvnw5RX_tuTCw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "marnew@iab.org" <marnew@iab.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11440f62ed3e6a052080cc87
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marnew/B69YiJyEgb1LsE2b4_Ul2P8luZ0>
Subject: Re: [Marnew] RFC 6077
X-BeenThere: marnew@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Managing Radio Networks in an Encrypted World <marnew.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marnew/>
List-Post: <mailto:marnew@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:34:11 -0000

If I might  make a suggestion ...

It seems to me that if we liimit our statements to "I would never do this
(and, in the context of this workshop, I can tell you that the operator I
work for would never do this)", rather than "no operator would do this", we
may have a more productive conversation.

People may say "no one would ever do this" and be correct about that, but
we don't actually need to decide whether everyone on earth agrees, in order
to have most of the discussions we need to have.

Spencer, speaking as a humble member of the program committee, but only one
member ...

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email