IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Marnew] endpoint consent

Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Wed, 23 September 2015 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8083E1A8ACA for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MALFORMED_FREEMAIL=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SBYblpnBJpfo for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C88FD1A910E for <marnew@iab.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgez77 with SMTP id z77so25998389qge.1 for <marnew@iab.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :mime-version:content-type; bh=47MGD0DhR6QC4vpyo/3p4Gs1G6nRsWnENxEaCunW2Fc=; b=HrgoaZkWgU8TJxWzYjUDEoEN1pylsDTPl7pmBhL1PBho6nU5wYWaFV5oaploX/47b3 F5Pg6qgjsEjQZ6U+cOULXigFG8Uu3LeD8RddbbOPBnXjCMa8fTWRfhx4J8D+2uVXzbJi ApFIHcynbDCghD79NTZ08RnU8sM7ucxtKD2Xa5nkXFPr0gLerYC4tRr+Ade1TEem7XiH vwfRvh5WsHV8vBtdPhwomdJOWqdDQE+s0OjXkpEH/Amx2RLKHemTEUxuY+34mQUiqUGG oLeErXugZBjLOl0/aj21f8uJGZaJ2Np2ZTtfKoVAGTtn3p7KoGQKguOP1SyTcFU98XSg SrXA==
X-Received: by 10.140.18.240 with SMTP id 103mr39442663qgf.31.1443031477846; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.30.19.116] ([72.246.0.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r16sm2964954qkl.3.2015.09.23.11.04.37 for <marnew@iab.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150911
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:04:36 -0400
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: <marnew@iab.org>
Message-ID: <1991284A-864D-45C0-A016-A64C8FA5F029@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: endpoint consent
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3525861877_1815429755"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marnew/NuPL00S7O3CXKHvt_x-_y076Hj4>
Subject: [Marnew] endpoint consent
X-BeenThere: marnew@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Managing Radio Networks in an Encrypted World <marnew.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marnew/>
List-Post: <mailto:marnew@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:14:04 -0000

In the interest in warming up the discussion…

I’ve seen in a few papers that ‘endpoint consent’ is considered a critical element when discussing middlebox participation.  But I haven’t seen a clear articulation of whether both endpoints must consent or, if not, how to decide which one.  I would say that currently at most one endpoint is explicitly involved with middleboxes.  But perhaps that is only because our protocols don’t support such a three-way negotiation.   

—aaron

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email