IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Marnew] RFC 6077

Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Thu, 24 September 2015 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D6F1AD079 for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NNHMLPdXDSiG for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3BF61AD04E for <marnew@iab.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so28476740wic.0 for <marnew@iab.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oqwae2a2nHTQNI1KQq7ELezZgF6qZSRlq9EKMEHo5Pk=; b=DSClShZ1o5UR+gN6JK8NLeC25z0QfQmuoB5rNfaq7azvP/ZoKWmqCrvEMdTDDVra4z 1yIhT3SJ3oDBMwTAdZ8qCrE4gUYKadxTtoYs98/Ty6Id4f65fhWu0DVuE6GKXmtOd3hM pPd6ACsLVh/3T9X4rwFIPx0lafZSCK7Vq9gdbafY+Z1yQ7skYHbVOpUS0FC5G5xmmkVm XtIE6TdVMdKCFE0ggQcUfR7RsRh/lSmD3NwkFFfvpuMIaQy9FwgU/Kr/qPMap04mmAae 6HvadpGAH24b/L3+StrDescrr2uODWQm4Viu0H5gdOfRUAvgo6jXakjwPFYSjVBF6pq6 SXZw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.90.107 with SMTP id bv11mr10750113wib.69.1443101624208; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.192.40 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4b7043329bcb471e894fe994d93feb0e@ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D484CEA55@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <1btgnrka8yjoatcenyhh7rj9.1443094482483@email.android.com> <A98526CB-31EA-4CA0-A7CE-F0DA9645AE33@fb.com> <CAD6AjGQdyTRR=19SOTkjq1dm0d+1LRTTLKQNH9S-6wUNgnGZeA@mail.gmail.com> <816A185E-0255-46FF-BCBF-6334C43C18B2@fb.com> <4b7043329bcb471e894fe994d93feb0e@ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:33:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGRnCfsKRSyhBRX+pV6vYO3w_StSf8kGMG2UxWF_UEg5pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c81d4af927405207e47ad
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marnew/nZ5lNR0XoWNz92K9q9wUT_xp4mE>
Cc: Blake Matheny <bmatheny@fb.com>, "Scharf, Michael \(Michael\)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>, "Smith, Kevin, \(R&D\) Vodafone Group" <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>, "marnew@iab.org" <marnew@iab.org>
Subject: Re: [Marnew] RFC 6077
X-BeenThere: marnew@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Managing Radio Networks in an Encrypted World <marnew.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marnew/>
List-Post: <mailto:marnew@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 13:33:47 -0000

On Thursday, September 24, 2015, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> > Just because the signals are ephemeral/dynamic don’t mean they aren’t
> useful. TCP does not provide these hints.
>
> And UDP is mportant.  And a use case of someone using their phone at home,
> then in the car, and then in the office, is important.  (For example,
> watching a keynote while in a carpool (certainly not driving;), before
> coming into a work meeting.  Or watching a football  game at the office and
> then on the train home.)
>
>

Your point to me is not clear.

But rtcp has a performance reporting function that works with udp / rtp

That said, i am not optimistic on udp's resurgence

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory-00


> --
> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
> IM: richsalz@jabber.at <javascript:;> Twitter: RichSalz
>
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email