Re: [Marnew] Why?
Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Fri, 19 June 2015 16:00 UTC
Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marnew@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76151A9155 for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rTjSDIQA14M8 for <marnew@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93CCF1A916D for <marnew@iab.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so23281789wig.0 for <marnew@iab.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2RK+iT8gfSpfVDdDebnwXhSERfVD0niyqDYFpD1P1ks=; b=MQyV0ihv7eyzlE3ffpAZmMSMT3m5sOwc15anZpOiuRLwPgUp44ITHnaz8bNuGXxxpu 9NSXH62dXdwp1Es8k2neuzpd5Ga2z3dBj5LDyExsaEmJjMA3w+rAl46/SbFnzmKHpUd4 qU4wuhz6l5tOc0nfYpyG5bflr3fyjFxYmw9OkKaxCj9y/TOhFbKIGvWqv36BIJA3VcdS r+ZyNQI0ft720eAKeooPrtoYh1t4PAT+JDfeTu2DZqmAX8qGKz11a4chad/YqafR9XRc 0fa4KIZ4+6bTHraLJL3/r0OreE2zEsY/WucjGu3kKBfYnM0MQ5cHzVq+S/OAIUxgIrd5 XlDQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.95.10 with SMTP id dg10mr8067797wib.41.1434729636134; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.79.65 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A4BAAB326B17CE40B45830B745F70F108E070212@VOEXM17W.internal.vodafone.com>
References: <CAD6AjGRFPFmBY1bR_qv4A8KARVVyHmLbF4vJNuA4DSGfB_Tc+w@mail.gmail.com> <A4BAAB326B17CE40B45830B745F70F108E06F6C1@VOEXM17W.internal.vodafone.com> <495D169E-7C17-457E-8201-AF2FA6935B17@cisco.com> <A4BAAB326B17CE40B45830B745F70F108E070212@VOEXM17W.internal.vodafone.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:00:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGS3N3PqrxXabHnr9Yb3VxXxVCMXO1VqfeSC9DKxsNbgzg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: "Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group" <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04447f834f86db0518e10690"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marnew/qckUp_kem-Faln7u3zMXPW1Fia0>
Cc: "marnew@iab.org" <marnew@iab.org>, 🔓Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Marnew] Why?
X-BeenThere: marnew@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Managing Radio Networks in an Encrypted World <marnew.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/marnew/>
List-Post: <mailto:marnew@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/marnew>, <mailto:marnew-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:00:39 -0000
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group < Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > Does WiFi suffer the same radio issues? > > I assume so, would be good to hear from experts on > similarities/differences. > > > rapid ingress/egress to the network. > > Lots of devices entering or leaving a particular access node suddenly. > Classic examples would be everyone turning on their phone when landing at > an airport, a fast train transiting between two cell towers and the > passenger's devices handing over between those towers. > > Cheers > Kevin > > This a classic corner case that does not happen in real life. We have been through deep analysis on this when we got scared of what X2 would mean in LTE. CB > > From: 🔓Dan Wing [mailto:dwing@cisco.com] > Sent: 18 June 2015 18:53 > To: Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group > Cc: Ca By; marnew@iab.org > Subject: Re: [Marnew] Why? > > > On 18-Jun-2015 06:27 am, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group < > Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com> wrote: > Hi CB, > > > Is there a summary of why mobile networks are special and require > treatment that is above and beyond dsl / cable / enterprise networks? > You’re right, this needs to be more explicit. All are regulated networks > (mobile/DSL/cable by licencing authority(s), enterprise by company), so for > me the key distinction for mobile is radio signal volatility > > Does WiFi suffer the same radio issues? > > and rapid ingress/egress to the network. > > I don't understand what is meant by rapid ingress/egress to the network. > > > > The resulting increased packet loss and cell congestion bursts arguably > make queue management more important in radio: i.e. queuing the content by > type so that it can be delivered according to latency/bandwidth > requirements. The content type is harder (or not possible) to infer when > encrypted. Would be good to know to what extent this is also a problem in > DSL/cable. > > > I understand spectrum is precious, but so is copper and fiber plants. > Agreed, I don’t think that is a valid reason to distinguish mobile. > > > I read the gsma document, but i found it to be unhelpful > This document was the basis for [1]: happy to take comments/issues at [2]. > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-encrypted-traffic-management-02 > [2] https://github.com/Kevsy/encrypted-traffic-management > > Nice summary document, thanks. I don't think I had read it previously, my > bad. > > -d > > > > > Cheers > Kevin > > Kevin Smith, Vodafone R&D > > _______________________________________________ > Marnew mailing list > Marnew@iab.org > https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/marnew > > >
- [Marnew] Why? Ca By
- Re: [Marnew] Why? Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Marnew] Why? Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
- Re: [Marnew] Why? Roland Zink
- Re: [Marnew] Why? 🔓Dan Wing
- Re: [Marnew] Why? Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
- Re: [Marnew] Why? Ca By