Re: [martini] Consensus call: Resolution of Ticket #57

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 03 September 2010 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821C73A68C3 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.867, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V+hVqcU0Fp4B for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB723A67E4 for <martini@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7b91ae000001aef-e9-4c813b09fec3
Received: from esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F8.5E.06895.90B318C4; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:14:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.78]) by esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.87]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:14:33 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:13:46 +0200
Thread-Topic: [martini] Consensus call: Resolution of Ticket #57
Thread-Index: ActLdg10WkkQAltPQLGvpgf32mVKGQAHbKBF
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585015BCA58@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <BLU137-W878D9ABB4B6A396E0682493860@phx.gbl> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C48DB925@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <006e01cb4b74$b0cb15a0$126140e0$@us>, <4C8108EB.2020409@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C8108EB.2020409@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] Consensus call: Resolution of Ticket #57
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:14:07 -0000

Hi,

>Wow. Server implementation is at 31%. That's better than some of the
>IMS-mandated (MUST, not SHOULD) mechanisms like service-route (23%) and
>sigcomp (15%). And it ties with ipsec, which is also MUST-strength in
>IMS networks.

I guess that means that the IMS compliant products are not present at SIPit :)

Regards,

Christer