Re: [martini] Olive & Cocktail Napkins

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Sat, 06 November 2010 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6643A68DE for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.336
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.336 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.263, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gikHnfFoVEbF for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745A13A68E7 for <Martini@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:49:24 -0400
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:49:24 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:49:20 -0400
Thread-Topic: [martini] Olive & Cocktail Napkins
Thread-Index: Act+DTvCYL8kGYo0TMmsGEaJWKcjqQ==
Message-ID: <FCE30476-3174-45B1-A99D-5886B1B05CA7@acmepacket.com>
References: <3C8A22A6-2D1F-4064-A1E1-F599867AEB1D@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C8A22A6-2D1F-4064-A1E1-F599867AEB1D@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "martini@ietf.org" <Martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] Olive & Cocktail Napkins
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:49:12 -0000

Which is why I said in the announcement that the draft's just a straw-man and requires actual design decisions.
:)

I didn't see the rush to ask people to dwell on it until GIN was done and out. (nor do I think I would have gotten anywhere before then anyway)

-hadriel


On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:30 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:

> 
> I suspect this general approach can work but I was really hoping to see far more of the details worked out  - it's still pretty much a back of the cocktail napkin level design. For example,, when a given 4 digit dialing plan is partitioned across a couple PBX and perhaps some of the elements support and some don't, I wonder about what will happened. Its hard to figure out if it all works or not without getting more of the details fleshed out. That said, I think this looks promising, I just wish it was further along - and I'm not volunteering to send text :-) 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini