IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG lastCall on"Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"

<bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com> Mon, 26 July 2010 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1596D3A69FA for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cwITGF5mgxrf for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67ACD3A69E8 for <martini@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D1987FC400D; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:17:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B4FFC4001; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:16:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:16:35 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:16:34 +0200
Message-ID: <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101B50E4E@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <430FC6BDED356B4C8498F634416644A9258D7F4093@mail>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG lastCall on"Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"
Thread-Index: AcsoIcTgTg+jMHVnTxyi6qCUI4QITgAAfBawAAYwBTAAGpPdsAB09bMwAIXfCRA=
References: <BLU137-W168F37C34E4BA034704B8893BB0@phx.gbl><9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101AEE888@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr><000001cb2758$9c977cd0$d5c67670$@us><A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAECBA4A08@MCHP058A.global-ad.net><B011440129B84B30978779D2BCA75D18@china.huawei.com><9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101B1EBC5@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr><4C45C316.1090702@nostrum.com> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101B1EC01@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <430FC6BDED356B4C8498F634416644A9258D7F3A57@mail> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101B1ECEF@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <430FC6BDED356B4C8498F634416644A9258D7F4093@mail>
From: bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com
To: HKaplan@acmepacket.com, adam@nostrum.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2010 07:16:35.0739 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B670EB0:01CB2C92]
Cc: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG lastCall on"Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:17:11 -0000

 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Hadriel Kaplan [mailto:HKaplan@acmepacket.com] 
> Envoyé : vendredi 23 juillet 2010 17:30
> À : CHATRAS Bruno RD-CORE-ISS; adam@nostrum.com
> Cc : bernard_aboba@hotmail.com; martini@ietf.org
> Objet : RE: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG lastCall 
> on"Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com 
> [mailto:bruno.chatras@orange- 
> > ftgroup.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:36 AM
> > 
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Hadriel Kaplan [mailto:HKaplan@acmepacket.com] 
> Envoyé : mardi 
> > > 20 juillet 2010 20:56 If the PBX only registered a single 
> contact, 
> > > then the SSP wouldn't be able to indicate two different 
> target AoR 
> > > domains
> > > - but that's actually a GOOD thing, I think.  Either the 
> PBX knows 
> > > about the two AoR domains, in which case it should have 
> registered 
> > > for them separately;
> > 
> > ==>BC: Of course it can register them separately 
> (especially if there 
> > are only two sub-domains) but why should we mandate this behavior 
> > while there are other more flexible solutions that do not 
> have this constraint?
> 
> Because it follows 3261?  Because it keeps the request-uri as 
> the identity and the address of the target, as opposed to 
> just the identity but not the address?
> 
> Also, it's arguable which is more "flexible".  Having a 
> separate REGISTER for each AoR domain allows the service 
> provider to have separate registrars responsible for each 
> domain, and invoke separate service-route and paths.

Flexible in miy mind means that the solution should be flexible enough to work in both cases: separate or single REGISTER for each AoR domain. In other words a good solution should not place a constraint on this point.


> 
> -hadriel
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email